Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Nathanson noted the many mentions of a civic complex and recalled the council's discussions of <br />planning on the west side of downtown, when she had been disappointed that the City Council failed <br />to move ahead with ideas related to a civic complex in the area adjacent to what was proposed to be <br />the new public library. At the time, many people were dismayed by the idea of City Hall no longer <br />being proximate to other government agencies located on the eastside of downtown. Since then, <br />some of those agencies had moved and others relocated nearby. Ms. Nathanson said she did not want <br />the council to lose sight of the fact that a civic complex of sorts existed near the west end near the <br />Lane Transit District station in the form of the library and the Atrium Building, which housed the <br />City's Planning and Development Department, and suggested that the City focus some its planning <br />on that area through renovations and "face lift" activities. Ms. Nathanson endorsed Mr. Meisner's <br />comments regarding the economies of scale to be realized through shared parking structures, etc. She <br />thought it made sense to look at an eastside civic complex. <br /> <br /> The motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />B. WORK SESSION: Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Comprehensive Plan Update <br /> <br />Library, Recreation, and Cultural Services Director Angel Jones, Parks and Open Space Planning <br />Manager Andrea Riner, and Parks and Open Space Director Johnny Medlin joined the council for the <br />item. Ms. Riner provided a PowerPoint presentation on the parks and open space planning effort <br />currently underway. The presentation included information about the goals of the planning process, a <br />process time line, and details about the public involvement process and resulting findings. Ms. Riner <br />previewed next steps in the process. <br /> <br />Following the presentation, Mr. Pap6 called on Ms. Nathanson as the Chair of the Mayor's Parks and <br />Open Space Committee for Comprehensive Planning for her comments on the topic. Ms. Nathanson <br />said that the committee had been meeting for one year. She said that the committee had been <br />gathering data on many topics, including existing services and programs, a needs assessments for <br />youth, adults, and seniors, a financial analysis, and information about trends in parks uses and <br />activities. She noted that many changes had occurred in park trends over the last decade because of <br />changes in demographics. Those trends had a significant impact on the programs and facilities the <br />City would offer its residents in the future. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson said the committee would review the parks inventory at its next meeting and then <br />begin to work on its recommendations. She said the committee needed to be cognizant of the need to <br />plan for land acquisition, building, equipment, as well as services and programs. Those were <br />different things, and the ongoing cost implications created a different set of choices. Ms. Nathanson <br />emphasized that the task of updating the comprehensive plan was not a simple one. It was all about <br />looking to the future. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson recalled that during the most recent update on the comprehensive plan councilors had <br />questioned what the City would do with the left-over bond money; she said that there was no money <br />"left over" because the process of implementing the bond had not been completed. She passed out <br />copies of the most recent project update and called the council's attention to those projects yet to be <br />completed. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 29, 2003 Page 7 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />