Item C: City Manager Evaluation - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Element A: Council Goals and Service Delivery Overall Rating Satisfied 1 2 3 4 5 Indicators _ _ N/A _ _ 1. Has the Manager achieved service delivery objectives as evidenced by the attainment of performance measures in the Service Profiles? X ..... 2. Are Council decisions implemented in a way that reflects Council intent and direction? _ X .... 3. Do senior staff effectively respond to Council Goals, Action Priorities and Council directives? X_ .... 4. Does the Manager make tough decisions with sensitivity to political realities? 5. Is the organization moving the community toward the following goals? _ X_ _ _ _ A. Safe Community _ X .... B. Sustainable Community Growth and Change _ X .... C. Healthy Natural and Built Environment _ _ X_ _ _ D. Accessible and Thriving Culture and Recreation X ..... E. Effective, Accountable Municipal Government _ _ X_ _ _ F. Fair, Stable and Adequate Financial Resources Comments including examples of past performance to support your appraisal 1. The question is not applicable. 2. Just a few recent examples of serious deficiencies in this area; Council's motion to prioritize street preservation for flexible funding through the MPC/MPO process, and Council's resolution to make an application for the Enterprise Zone, and the administrative rules implementing the Smoking Ordinance. Regarding street preservation; we had to direct the manager 2 or 3 times to implement and it still is not the policy. MPC/MPO follows the lead of the staffteam acting as the Transportation Planning Committee and if the manager directed staff members to ensure implementation, it would get done. It is the staff team that frames the decision packages for the MPO and they have neglected to move on this direction, atypically leaving it to the MPO for direction. TPC created the matrix, they can initiate the change. The magnitude of the mismanagement of the Enterprise Zone application is stunning. Will there be any accountability for it?