My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 07/18/05 Mtg
>
Item 2A: Approval of Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:30:32 PM
Creation date
7/14/2005 9:59:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/18/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
related that she had discussed this with Mr. Torrey via email. She believed there were many young people <br />who were unable to participate in sports or who did not have an interest in participating whose interests <br />were not provided allocations. She thought there were other deserving entities and would prefer to allow <br />all of them to compete equally for the money. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap6 called Kidsports a wonderful organization and a value to the community. He called this <br />request a "heck of a way to run a railroad" because Kidsports had known of its need for an increase for "a <br />while." He asked Executive Director for the Library, Recreation, and Cultural Services Department <br />(LRCS) Angel Jones to speak to the timing of the request. <br /> <br />Ms. Jones explained that the request had not been included in the LRCS budget because the department <br />was operating under a status quo budget and so did not submit requests for additional service <br />improvements. She did not know why the request had not surfaced during budget discussions. She said <br />Kidsports requested an increase in funding every year, as did other organizations. <br /> <br />Councilor Papfi asked if Kidsports was taking on as much or more in maintenance and were they doing <br />less with more. Ms. Jones responded that the role of Kidsports had changed over the last few years <br />because there were now a number of entities that provided athletic opportunities to young people. She <br />thought the high performers, the true athletes, went into those other programs, leaving Kidsports with core <br />recreations programs for those who did not have the skills and/or the resources to go to the more elite <br />programs. She said the level of maintenance that Kidsports had taken on remained the same over the <br />years, but the participation level in Kidsports had increased. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor asked if this was a one-time funding allocation or if it was intended to be ongoing. <br />Councilor Solomon replied that it was for an ongoing increase. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor remarked that it was always difficult to address something brought up at the last minute. <br />However, he averred that Kidsports was a very important program that had been around for a long time. <br />He underscored that the program was in "desperate financial condition." He stressed that there were <br />programs for the "sports superstars" but there were not many opportunities for the less able kids, the kids <br />who were not as competitive, and the kids who just wanted to play. He said, in this instance, he was <br />inclined to reluctantly support the amendment because Kidsports was a "great program." <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz agreed with concerns about the proposal coming at the "eleventh hour." But she had <br />utilized the Kidsports program and had benefited from its scholarships. She indicated that she would be <br />more likely to "100 percent support" the amendment if it was for a one-time allocation. <br /> <br /> Councilor Ortiz offered a friendly amendment to specify that this would be a one-time <br /> allocation. The maker and second of the motion accepted the friendly amendment. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly said he was a "long way" from being able to support the amendment. He thought it <br />important to look at the panoply of requests and determine which ones deserved funding. He was <br />"dumbfounded" that the proposal had not been brought to the Budget Committee. He agreed that it was <br />an important program in tough financial straits, but he averred one could say this about many youth- <br />oriented programs in the comtnunity. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor opposed the amendment. She cited a number of items that were not being funded or <br />funded adequately, such as the Sister Cities Program and various arts programs. She wished to give <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 13, 2005 Page 14 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.