Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />McGinley (A 18-5) October 2018 Page 2 <br />Policy 15. Ultimately, land within the UGB shall be annexed to a city and provided with <br />the required minimum level of urban facilities and services. While the time <br />frame for annexation may vary, annexation should occur as land transitions <br />from urbanizable to urban. (page II-C-5) <br /> <br />The following policy from the Residential Element of the Metro Plan is also applicable: <br /> <br />Policy A.2 Residentially designated land within the UGB should be zoned consistent with <br />the Metro Plan, and applicable plans and policies; however, existing <br />agricultural zoning may be continued within the area between the city limits <br />and UGB until rezoned for urban uses. <br /> <br />The Metro Plan designates the annexation area as appropriate for low-density <br />residential use. The River Road-Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan (RR-SC) is the adopted <br />refinement plan for the subject property and also designates the area for low-density <br />residential use. The property is currently zoned R-1 Low-Density Residential and /UL <br />Urbanizable Land Overlay. The /UL overlay will be automatically removed from the <br />zoning following annexation approval. <br /> <br />The subject property is not located within a special subarea of the RR -SC. The proposed <br />annexation advances Residential Land Use Policy 1 of the RR-SC, which encourages land <br />uses that recognize and maintain “the predominately low-density residential character <br />of the area consistent with the Metro Plan.” In addition, the proposed annexation does <br />not appear to conflict with any other residential land use policies of the RR-SC. <br /> <br />As previously discussed in this subsection, and further detailed under subsection (3) <br />below, the proposed annexation is consistent with Metro Plan growth management <br />policies and can be served by the minimum level of key urban services. The annexation <br />procedures beginning at EC 9.7800 are consistent with State law and therefore, as found <br />throughout this report, the annexation is consistent with State law. <br /> <br />Therefore, based on the findings above, the proposal is consistent with the applicable <br />policies of the Metro Plan and refinement plan. <br /> <br />EC 9.7825(3) The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key <br />urban facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be provided in an <br />orderly, efficient, and timely manner. <br />Complies Findings: Consistent with this criterion, the proposed annexation will result in a <br />boundary in which the minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be <br />provided in an orderly, efficient, and timely manner as detailed below: <br /> <br />Wastewater <br />A 4-inch wastewater line is stubbed to the subject property via the 8-inch mainline in <br />Cindy Street. There are no on-hold wastewater assessments on this tax lot. <br /> <br /> <br />YES <br /> NO <br />November 13, 2018, Meeting – Item 3C