Laserfiche WebLink
Day Joint Trust (A 18-6) November 2018 Page 2 <br />Policy 15. Ultimately, land within the UGB shall be annexed to a city and provided with <br />the required minimum level of urban facilities and services. While the time <br />frame for annexation may vary, annexation should occur as land transitions <br />from urbanizable to urban. (page 11-C-5) <br />The following policy from the Residential Element of the Metro Plan is also applicable: <br />Policy A.2 Residentially designated land within the UGB should be zoned consistent with <br />the Metro Plan, and applicable plans and policies; however, existing <br />agricultural zoning may be continued within the area between the city limits <br />and UGB until rezoned for urban uses. <br />The Metro Plan designates the annexation area as appropriate for medium -density <br />residential use. The River Road - Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan (RR/SC UFP) is the <br />adopted refinement plan for the subject properties and also designates the area for <br />residential uses. Consistent with the land use designations, the property is currently <br />zoned R-2 Medium -Density Residential with /UL Urbanizable Land Overlay. The /UL <br />overlay will be automatically removed from the zoning following annexation approval. <br />With regard to applicable policies of the RR/SC UFP, the subject property is located <br />within the River Road/Howard subarea, which recommends medium -density residential <br />development for the subject property. Further, none of the general "Residential Land <br />Use Policies" at Section 2.2 appear to be directly applicable to the subject request. The <br />"Public Facilities and Services Element" policies of the RR/SC UFP are directed at local <br />government; however, the premise of these policies (regarding the provision of urban <br />services) is the assumption that property within the UGB will be annexed. <br />As previously discussed in this subsection, and further detailed under subsection (3) <br />below, the proposed annexation is consistent with Metro Plan growth management <br />policies and can be served by the minimum level of key urban services. The annexation <br />procedures beginning at EC 9.7800 are consistent with State law and therefore, as found <br />throughout this report, the annexation is consistent with State law. <br />Therefore, based on the findings above, the proposal is consistent with the applicable <br />policies of the Metro Plan and RR/SC UFP refinement plan. <br />EC 9.7825(3) The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key <br />urban facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be provided in an <br />orderly, efficient, and timely manner. <br />Complies <br />Findings: Consistent with this criterion, the proposed annexation will result in a <br />boundary in which the minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be <br />❑ <br />❑ NO <br />YES <br />provided in an orderly, efficient, and timely manner as detailed below: <br />Wastewater <br />There is an 8 -inch public wastewater in Owosso Drive adjacent to this parcel. As an <br />informational item there is an on -hold wastewater assessment for this tax lot, which will <br />need to be paid prior to any development on this tax lot. <br />Day Joint Trust (A 18-6) November 2018 Page 2 <br />