Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit C <br />Planning Director's Findings and Recommendation <br />Annexation Request for Margot Zallen Revocable Trust <br />(City File: A 18-7) <br />Application Submitted: August 27, 2018 <br />Applicant: Margot Zallen Revocable Trust <br />Property Included in Annexation Request: Portion of Tax Lot 100 of Assessor's Map 1803-1630 <br />Zoning: R-1 Low Density Residential with /UL Urbanlzable land Overlay <br />Location: East side of Spring Boulevard, south of 43c Avenue <br />Representative: Wllllam Randall, Arbor South Architecture, PC, 541 344 3332 <br />Lead City Staff: Nicholas Gloello, Ory of Eugene Planning Division, 541£82-5453 <br />EVALULATION: <br />Based on the Information provided by the applicant, the City has determined that this request complies <br />with Eugene Code LEG) Semon 9.2805 Annexation -Applicability. As such, It is subject to review and <br />approval In accordance with the requirements, application criteria and procedures of EC 9.7800 through <br />9.2835. The applicable approval a terla are presented below In bold typeface with findings and <br />conduslons following each. <br />EC9.7825(1( The land proposed to be annexed is within the city' s urban growth boundary and is: <br />(a( Contiguous to the city limits; or <br />(b( Separated from the city only by a public right of way or a stream, bay, lake or other <br />body ofwater. <br />Complies <br />Findings: A portion of the subject tax lot is located within the Oty/s urban growth <br />boundary LUGS), with a larger portion of the subject tax lot to the east located outside of <br />NO <br />YES <br />theUGB. The annexation only Includes the area of the subject tax lot within the UGB, <br />while the land area outside the UGB will remain under the jurisdiction of Lane County. <br />The area of annexation Is contiguous to the City limits along Its west property boundary, <br />consistent with subsection (2(. <br />EC 9.7825(2( The proposed annexation is conairtentwith applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in <br />aapplicable refinement lane. <br />Complies <br />Findings: Several policies from the Metro Plan provide support for this annexation by <br />encouraging compact urban growth to adhleve efficient use of and urban service <br />E] NO <br />YES <br />provisions within the UGB,Inducing the following ponces from the Growth <br />Management sector (In Italic text): <br />Policy B. Land with In the UGB may be convenadfrom urbanlzable to urban only <br />through annexation to a city ween It isfou no that: <br />a. Aminimum hotel Gf kry urbonfacillbac andservlcec can beprovldedto the <br />area in an orderly and fflcient manner. <br />b. There will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban servicer <br />andfacilldac. Conversion f urbanlzable land to urban shall also be <br />consistent with the Metro Plan. (page 11 CA) <br />Mail a nuw acowgehmn 1p 18-zl November Y18 EYE <br />