Laserfiche WebLink
CLEAR & OBJECTIVE HOUSING: APPROVAL C RITERIA UPDATE <br />November 13, 2018 DRAFT Preferred Concepts Report: Maintenance Issues Page 14 of 59 <br />compliance through a code provision applicable to a special area zone or overlay zone: <br />(a) EC 9.2000 through 9.3980 regarding lot dimensions and density requirements for the <br />subject zone. . . <br />9.2790 Solar Lot Standards. <br />(1) Applicability. Solar lot standards apply to the creation of lots within subdivisions in R-1 and R-2 <br />zones. <br />(2) Solar Lot Requirements. In R-1 and R-2, at least 70% percent of the lots in a subdivision shall be <br />designed as “solar lots” and shall have a minimum north -south dimension of 75 feet and a front <br />lot line orientation that is within 30 degrees of the true east-west axis. For purposes of this <br />subsection, a lot proposed for more than one dwelling unit shall count as more than one lot, <br />according to the number of units proposed (e.g. a lot proposed for a fourplex shall be <br />considered 4 lots). (See Figure 9.2790(2) Solar Lot Requirements.) <br />*** <br />Recommendation : Remove standard from planned unit development approval criteria (EC 9.8325(10)) based <br />on related recommendation to allow tentative subdivisions and tentative planned unit development reviews <br />concurrently (see issue # COM-11). <br />Solar lot standards only apply to the creation of lots within subdivisions in the R-1 Low-Density Residential and <br />R-2 Medium-Density Residential zones. Without concurrent review for subdivisions and planned unit <br />developments, as is currently the process, the requirement in the planned unit development criteria is intended <br />to ensure that the lot layout approved in the tentative PUD will be approvable under the tentative subdivision. <br />While the solar lot standards do not apply directly to PUDs, having this criterion makes sense given the order of <br />application processing, i.e., tentative planned unit development followed by tentative subdivision. If the <br />recommendation to allow concurrent review of tentative planned unit developments and tentative subdivisions <br />is implemented, then the need for this criterion under the planned unit development will no longer exist; <br />therefore, removal is recommended if the concurrent review option is implemented. <br />COM-11 (PUD/SUBDIVISION CONCURRENT REVIEW) <br />Description : Planned unit developments are a two-step process (tentative, followed by final). When there is <br />an associated land division (subdivision or partition) to create new lots, the tentative planned unit development <br />must be finalized prior to submittal of the tentative partition or subdivision. (EC 9.8205 and 9.8505) Together <br />this means three stages of review for many developments: tentative planned unit development review, followed <br />by final planned unit development and tentative subdivision or partition plan review combined, and finally, <br />review of the final subdivision or partition plan. <br />Applies To : Partition, Planned Unit Development, Subdivision <br />Existing Code Section(s): EC 9.8205, EC 9.8505 <br />Existing Code Language : <br />9.8205 Applicability of Partition, Tentative Plan Applications . Requests to create 2 or 3 parcels shall <br />be subject to the partition provisions of this land use code, following a Type II application <br />procedure. A partition application that also involves a PUD request may not be submitted until <br />a decision on the tentative PUD approval is final. (Refer to EC 9.8305 Applicability.) No <br />November 26, 2018, Work Session – Item 2