Laserfiche WebLink
CLEAR & OBJECTIVE HOUSING: APPROVAL C RITERIA UPDATE <br /> <br /> <br />November 13, 2018 DRAFT Preferred Concepts Report: Maintenance Issues Page 17 of 59 <br /> <br />shall host a meeting for the surrounding property owners. The purpose of this <br />meeting is to provide a means for the applicant and surrounding property owners and <br />residents to meet to review the proposal, share information and identify issues <br />regarding the proposal. The applicant may consider whether to incorporate solutions <br />to these issues prior to application submittal. <br />(12) Applications shall be submitted to the city within 180 days of the <br />neighborhood/applicant meeting. If an application is not submitted in this time <br />frame, or if the site plan submitted with the application does not substantially <br />conform to the site plan provided at the meeting, the applicant shall be required to <br />hold a new neighborhood/applicant meeting. <br />*** <br />Recommendation : Provide an exception under the neighborhood/applicant meeting requirement at EC 9.7007 <br />for subdivisions and partitions when processed in conjunction with a planned unit development. <br />The requirement for a separate neighborhood/applicant meeting for partitions and subdivisions that are <br />implementing a site plan approved through the tentative planned unit development process is redundant and <br />unnecessary. The purpose of the neighborhood/applicant meeting is to “provide a means for the applicant and <br />surrounding property owners and residents to meet to review the proposal, share information and identify <br />issues regarding the proposal. The applicant may consider whether to incorporate solutions to these issues <br />prior to application submittal.” <br />In the circumstance where a land division is implementing a site plan that already has tentative planned unit <br />development approval, the land division must be consistent with the approved tentative planned unit <br />development, which has already held a neighborhood/applicant meeting and public hearing process. Removing <br />the requirement for a second meeting would promote efficiency in the development process. <br />Note that if the recommendation to allow concurrent review of tentative planned unit development and <br />tentative land division is implemented (see COM-11), then the need for this proposed change may no longer <br />exist. <br /> <br />COM-15 (SPECIAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS REFERENCE) <br />Description : Partitions, planned unit development, and subdivisions require compliance with EC 9.6800 <br />through EC 9.6875 Standards for Streets, Alleys, and Other Public Ways; however, housing projects reviewed <br />under clear and objective tracks are exempt from one of the standards within that range (EC 9.6845, Special <br />Safety Requirements). <br />Applies To : Partition, Planned Unit Development, Subdivision <br />Existing Code Section(s): EC 9.8220(2)(b), EC 9.8325(6)(a), EC9.8520(3)(b), EC 9.6845 <br />Existing Code Language : <br />9.8220(2) The proposed partition complies with all of the following: <br /> <br />November 26, 2018, Work Session – Item 2