Laserfiche WebLink
CLEAR & OBJECTIVE HOUSING: APPROVAL C RITERIA UPDATE <br /> <br /> <br />November 13, 2018 DRAFT Preferred Concepts Report: Significant Issues Page 21 of 59 <br /> <br />Significant Issues: Summary Table of Preferred Concepts <br />Significant Issue Preferred Concept Reason <br />COS-01 Clear & Objective <br />Compatibility <br />Add compatibility criterion to site reviews, conditional use and <br />planned unit development applicat ions that applies to higher - <br />intensity development abutting lower intensity development — <br />include transition buffers (setbacks, height limitation areas, and <br />landscape screening) that are scalable <br />Effectiveness, <br />Consistency <br />COS-02 30-Foot Buffer Requirement <br />For PUDs <br />Replace with new criterion from COS-01 Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS-03 20 Percent Slope Grading <br />Prohibition <br />Remove and rely on COS-13 Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS-04 One Acre Accessible Open <br />Space For PUDs <br />Revise required distance from open spa ce from ¼ mile to ½ mile <br />and make onsite requirement scalable <br />Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS-05 Limitation Over 900 Feet For <br />PUDs <br />Revise to allow less intensive development above 900’ (2.5 <br />units/acre) and include more stringent tree/vegetation <br />preservation requirement s <br />Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS-06 Ridgeline Setback For PUDs Revise to make setback a pplicable to areas above 900’ elevation. Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS-07 40 Percent Open Space <br />Requirement For PUDs <br />Revise to 30% and clarify language based on intent of relevant <br />South Hills Study policy <br />Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS-08 Emergency Response Add criterion to require letter from Fire Marshal’s office stating <br />that project complies with Eugene Fire Code for site reviews, <br />conditional use and planned unit development applicati ons; <br />apply criterion to partitions and subdivisions per COS-14 <br />Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS-09 Conditional Use <br />Requirement <br />Keep process, add compatibility criterion from COS-01 Effectiveness <br />COS-10 Partition Tree Preservation Remove criterion Efficiency, <br />Consistency <br />COS-11 Tree Preservation <br />Consideration <br />Add criterion that requires minimum preservation and mitigation <br />and implement a rating scale that takes into account tree type, <br />health, size and location. <br />Effectiveness <br />COS-12 Site Review Requirement Keep process, add compatibility criterion from COS-01 Effectiveness <br />COS-13 Geotechnical Requirement Revise existing criterion to address additional risk factors Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS-14 19 Lot Rule—Motor Vehicle <br />Dispersal <br />Rely on COS-08 (apply COS-08 to partitions and subdivisions) Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS-15 Traffic Impact Defer to Public Works Transportation project getting underway Effectiveness <br />COS-16 PUD Type III Process Hold for future land use code improvement project Efficiency <br />COS-17 Does Not Hamper Provision <br />Of Public Open Space <br />Moved t o C OM -18 Effectiveness <br />COS-18 Arborist And Landscape <br />Architect Requirement <br />No change (Continue to require arborist on PUD design team) Efficiency <br />COS-19 Street Standards <br />Modifications <br />Add clear exceptions and add adjustment option Efficiency <br />COS-20 Pedestrian Definition Use ORS definition with minor refinement Effectiveness <br /> <br />November 26, 2018, Work Session – Item 2