My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 11-26-18 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2018
>
11-26-2018
>
Agenda Packet 11-26-18 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2018 12:08:43 PM
Creation date
11/21/2018 12:01:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CLEAR & OBJECTIVE HOUSING: APPROVAL C RITERIA UPDATE <br />November 13, 2018 DRAFT Preferred Concepts Report: Significant Issues Page 28 of 59 <br />COS-04 (ONE A CRE A CCESSIBLE O PEN S PACE FOR PUDS) <br />Description : The clear and objective planned unit development criterion that requires open space to be <br />located within ¼ mile of the site can limit development to sites near existing open spaces such as public parks, <br />which may reduce those areas of the city that can be developed under the clear and objective track. Sites that <br />have to provide open space internal to the development to satisfy this criterion may lose a significant amount of <br />land due to the one-acre minimum requirement. This decreases housing development potential of the site and <br />affects smaller sites disproportionately. This criterion might not be the most effective and efficient way to <br />ensure access to recreation and open space for residents. <br />Applies To : Planned Unit Development <br />Existing Code Section(s): 9.8325(9) <br />Existing Code Language : <br /> (9) All proposed dwellings within the PUD are within 1/4 mile radius (measured from any point along the <br />perimeter of the development site) of an accessible recreation area or open space that is at least 1 <br />acre in size and will be available to residents . <br />A. No Change – – + – o –– <br />B. Adjust the maximum distance requirement based <br />on review of location of public parks/schools. List <br />what qualifies as accessible recreation area or <br />open space (i.e. private open space, public park, <br />schools) <br />+++oo o + <br />C. Revise to scale requirements based on average lot <br />sizes or density (i.e. require more open space for <br />higher density projects) <br />++++o ++ <br />E. Eliminate and rely on existing lot coverage <br />requirements for single-family development in the <br />R-1 zone (50%) and open space requirements for <br />multi-family developments (20% of development <br />site) <br />+–+–o oo <br />E. Eliminate if mapping jus tifies that most vacant and <br />partially vacant properties are generally within ¼ <br />mile from open space <br />+++oo o– <br />+ promotes o neutral –inhibits <br />Possible Concepts <br />November 26, 2018, Work Session – Item 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.