My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 11-26-18 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2018
>
11-26-2018
>
Agenda Packet 11-26-18 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2018 12:08:43 PM
Creation date
11/21/2018 12:01:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CLEAR & OBJECTIVE HOUSING: APPROVAL C RITERIA UPDATE <br />November 13, 2018 DRAFT Preferred Concepts Report: Significant Issues Page 37 of 59 <br />COS-08 (EMERGENCY R ESPONSE ) <br />Description : The clear and objective tracks for conditional use, planned unit development, and site review <br />applications do not include a criterion for protecting emergency response. <br />Applies To : Conditional Use, Planned Unit Development, Site Review <br />Existing Code Section(s): N/A <br />Existing Code Language : N/A <br />Recommendation : Add criterion that requires the applicant submit a letter from the Fire Marshal’s office <br />stating that the proposal complies with the applicable Eugene Fire Code requirements regarding fire apparatus <br />access roads and fire protection water supply. (Option C) <br />Option C received the most stakeholder support, with option B receiving moderate support. Implementation of <br />option B is less technically feasible as it would require periodic updates to the land use code to ensure the <br />adopted version stay consistent with the current version of Eugene Fire Code. This would also create an <br />undesirable redundancy in code as the Eugene Fire Code already applies. Option C would allow the Fire <br />Marshal’s office to determine whether it is feasible to provide services to proposed development and would <br />ensure that this coordination occur early in the design process. The Fire Marshal’s office is the best party to <br />evaluate whether a particular development can be served and the requirement of a letter is consistent with <br />other methods used to demonstrate compliance with standards (as for geotechnical and tree standards). <br />The Fire Marshal’s office supports this o ption as a more effective and efficient way to accomplish their review of <br />new proposals. <br />For these reasons, option C was the clear recommendation. <br />A. No change + – + o o –– <br />B. Add criterion that adopt the same standards as <br />the Eugene Fire Code pertaining to fire apparatus <br />access road and fire protection water supply <br />–––oo o+ <br />C. Add criterion to require that the applicant submit <br />a letter from the Fire Marshal's office stating that <br />the proposal complies with the applicable Eugene <br />Fire Code requirements regarding fire apparatus <br />access roads and fire protection water supply <br />+++oo ++ <br />+ promotes o neutral –inhibits <br />Possible Concepts <br />November 26, 2018, Work Session – Item 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.