My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 11-26-18 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2018
>
11-26-2018
>
Agenda Packet 11-26-18 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2018 12:08:43 PM
Creation date
11/21/2018 12:01:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CLEAR & OBJECTIVE HOUSING: APPROVAL C RITERIA UPDATE <br />November 13, 2018 DRAFT Preferred Concepts Report: Significant Issues Page 49 of 59 <br />COS-15 (TRAFFIC I MPACT) <br />Description : Compliance with Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) review is explicitly required as an approval criterion <br />under the discretionary tracks for conditional use, planned unit development and subdivision, but not for <br />projects under the clear and objective tracks. Separate TIA review can also be triggered by projects meeting the <br />TIA applicability standards, including generating over 100 peak hour vehicle trips. Due to the discretionary <br />nature of the TIA criteria, they are not suitable for projects using the clear and objective track. <br />Applies To : Conditional Use, Planned Unit Development, Site Review, Subdivision <br />Existing Code Section(s): N/A <br />Existing Code Language : N/A <br />Recommendation : De fer to more detailed Public Works Transportation project currently getting underway. <br />The working groups supported all options for a change that would require traffic impacts be considered for <br />approval of an application under the needed housing approval criteria. The split support highlights the <br />complexity of this issue. Since the Clear & Objective project began, Public Works Transportation has received <br />grant funding to update the transportation demand management program and traffic impact analysis process. <br />Public Works has confirmed that this issue can be addressed within the scope of this new project. Given the <br />A. No Change o o + o o o– <br />B. Add a requirement that the applicant demonstrate <br />that all intersections within a certain distance of <br />the project site not drop below the city’s <br />minimum level of service as a result of the <br />proposed project, or that impacts will be <br />mitigated. <br />o+ooo o+ <br />C. Add requirement to use crash rate data to require <br />applicants to pick from a menu of crash reduction <br />measures when crash rates exceed a given <br />threshold. <br />ooooo o+ <br />D. Increase use of transportation demand <br />management (TDM) plans to reduce demand on <br />the transportation system and reliance on the use <br />of cars, and encourage more walking, biking, <br />transit and ridesharing. <br />oooo+o+ <br />+ promotes o neutral –inhibits <br />Possible Concepts <br />November 26, 2018, Work Session – Item 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.