Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT D <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS <br /> <br />Alternative A Quad Gates All crossings <br /> <br />Installing quad gates at all ten crossing will meet the SSM at all crossing requirement but <br />is expensive. The FRA calculator estimates the cost to add quad gates as $100,000- <br />$125,000 per crossing. Union Pacific estimates the cost of up-grading the gates at <br />$400,000 each. ODOT rail estimates a generic dual gate to quad gate up-grade at <br />$250,000-$500,000, but points out the close spacing of Eugene's crossings could force <br />up-grades to the overall detection/prediction system "costing several millions." To <br />provide a Quiet Zone with quad gate upgrades at all ten crossings would cost over <br />$1,000,000 using the FRA estimate and $4-5 million using the UP or ODOT estimate. <br />Both ODOT and UP say an upgrade to the detection system may be needed and could <br />cost up to $2,000,000. These are construction costs and do not include the annual <br />maintenance agreement with the UP. This alternative increases public safety by reducing <br />the risk index below the "index with horns." <br /> <br />Alternative B Channelizing Islands except where streets must be closed <br /> <br />Installing median islands is estimated to cost $15,000 -20,000 per crossing in the FRA <br />calculator. Theoretically medians at each crossing could be done for about $200,000. <br />There are very restrictive rules about medians requiring closure of all commercial <br />driveways within 100 feet of the crossing gate. Medians will have major impacts to the <br />existing businesses. At Jefferson Street the grain elevator driveway would be closed. On <br />Pearl Street the Steelhead parking lot would be closed. At Monroe, Madison and Lincoln <br />businesses are likely to close from lack of access or have major parking and driveway <br />modifications. Some accesses near every crossing will be impacted. This alternative will <br />increase public safety by reducing the risk index below the "index with horns." <br /> <br />Alternatives C, D and E Mixed SSMs meeting the national risk index <br /> <br />The highest risk crossing in this area is High Street. A package of $SMs consisting of <br />quad gates at High street and a number of median installations can lower the risk index <br />below the National Index. For a lower construction cost installation of 5 medians can <br />meet the national risk index criteria. The cost to local business from loss of access will <br />be much higher. If implemented this zone would be subject to annual review. These <br />alternatives result in an increased risk index above existing conditions. <br /> <br /> <br />