Laserfiche WebLink
Commission held a series of work sessions to discuss modifications to the overall <br />program. Those discussions, held between November 2003 and June 2004, were wide <br />ranging and covered many topics including: <br /> · Public perception of nodal development and marketing the idea so that the public <br /> better understands the concept; <br /> · The variability of conditions within each of the identified nodal development <br /> areas; <br /> <br /> · The differences in types of nodal development areas; <br /> · Public reactions to the names: "nodal development" and "node." <br /> · Housing and whether all nodes should be required to have housing within them <br /> and, if so, how would that be achieved in the "employment" nodes like Willow <br /> Creek and Riverfront Research Park. <br /> · Has the opportunity for development or redevelopment, consistent with nodal <br /> development principles, been lost in some areas? Should all of the "potential <br /> nodal development areas" identified on the TransPlan map remain on the map? <br /> · Should we have targeted tools for the different kinds of nodal development areas; <br /> i.e. infill and redevelopment sites or 'greenfield' sites? <br /> · The status of potential nodal development areas that were not designated as "high- <br /> priority" by the Council. Questions arose about how those areas should be <br /> ranked for attention and work or whether they should be ranked at all. <br /> · The necessity for specific plans for all areas. Do all nodes require a full-blown <br /> specific plan to address the problems that need to be remedied? Which nodes are <br /> more likely to need a specific planning process and which might not? <br /> · How should we address requests (from public and private interests) that new areas <br /> be planned for nodal development? <br /> · How will we know when we've accomplished nodal development objectives in <br /> any given area? <br /> <br />Based on the Planning Commission's discussions and input from the public at those <br />meetings, staff prepared a Draft Two Year Work Program for Nodal Development <br />Implementation that presented a methodical approach to resolving the many issues raised <br />in those meetings. The Draft Two Year Work Program was a primary topic of discussion <br />at the 2004 Joint City Council Planning Commission Meeting held in October 2004. The <br />Nodal Development Implementation Two Year Work Program is included here as <br />Exhibit H. <br /> <br />Policy Framework <br /> <br />TransPlan Policies. It has been established that the policy basis for the nodal (mixed <br />use) development program is contained in the adopted Growth Management Policies as <br />well as the 2001 TransPlan. In a recent Council meeting where the policy consistency <br />issue was raised, the concern was focused on Growth Management Policies, rather than <br />TransPlan policies. Even so, a description of the five land use policies in TransPlan is <br />necessary if one is to fully evaluate how the mixed use program is carrying out City <br />policy. Those policies include the following: <br /> <br /> <br />