My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 12-10-18 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2018
>
12-10-2018
>
Agenda Packet 12-10-18 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2018 9:38:48 AM
Creation date
12/7/2018 9:34:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City_Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
City_Council_Meeting_Type
Work Session
City_Council_Meeting_Date
12/10/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br /> <br />Summaries of the community’s feedback (from the online form and email) are included in Appendix H: <br />Community Feedback. <br />Next StepsNext StepsNext StepsNext Steps <br />Now that the working group has completed their task, it is up to Council to decide where and how to act <br />on their recommendations. Some recommendations can be put into action quickly while others will <br />need more study to evaluate. The recommendation to develop a comprehensive plan (supported by 86% <br />of the working group) is one way by which the City could coordinate implementation of top ideas. <br />Given the “wicked” nature of housing affordability, many actions are likely to have trade-offs. Council <br />will have to weigh these against potential gains and against the consequences of doing nothing. <br /> <br />While many working group members felt <br />more time and data would be useful, many <br />also expressed a sense of urgency to act. <br />Overall, the group showed low confidence <br />that Council would take action (2.7 on a 5- <br />point scale with 3 being neutral) and <br />expressed dismay at this reality. Concerns <br />were expressed that demands for more <br />study and more process would delay <br />solutions that the working group firmly <br />support. In this, Council will have to decide <br />which ideas do indeed more study and <br />where they can take decisive action. <br /> <br />For “final thoughts” from the working <br />group, please see the Participant <br />Evaluation from 11/28/18 Meeting. It’s <br />particularly telling to read individual <br />comments regarding hopes for Council and <br />what people will tell community members <br />about the process. A word cloud of <br />people’s “message out” has been included <br />here. <br />About the FacilitatorAbout the FacilitatorAbout the FacilitatorAbout the Facilitator <br />Carrie Bennett has a Masters in Conflict and Dispute Resolution from the University of Oregon School <br />of Law. As part of her graduate training, Carrie held internships through the National Policy Consensus <br />Center at Portland State University, Healthy Democracy, and Neighbor to Neighbor Mediation. She has <br />been a small-claims court mediator in Lane, Linn, and Benton Counties. Aside from this formal <br />education and practice, Carrie apprenticed for two years under Susan Sparks, an interest-based facilitator <br />in Colorado. Through Susan, Carrie gained dispositions and strategies passed down from Bob <br />Chadwick. <br /> <br />Carrie actively participates in a housing affordability learning community with fellow facilitators and <br />conveners through the National Coalition for Dialogue and Deliberation. This group includes <br />professionals from across the country and multiple top-tier universities. Carrie’s past clients include the <br />United States Forest Service, Colorado State University, the University of Wyoming, the City of Fort <br />December 10, 2018, Work Session - Item 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.