Laserfiche WebLink
66 <br /> <br /> Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix FFFF: : : : Full ResultsFull ResultsFull ResultsFull Results <br />Strategy 1Strategy 1Strategy 1Strategy 1 <br /># Option Support Comments for Caution, Trade-Off <br />Comments Against <br />1 <br />Revise land use code to <br />encourage Accessory <br />Dwelling Units (ADUs) in <br />all single-family zones. <br />82% Required by state law <br />Increases diversity and choice <br />Must comply w/LDR max <br />density. Must include owner <br />occupancy <br />Need to put in mechanisms that <br />ensue not all AIRBNB but <br />housing <br />ADU #s will be trivial. No data <br />shows they will contribute to <br />availability & affordability <br />2 <br />Revise land use code to <br />allow Single-Room <br />Occupancy (SROs) by- <br />right in all residential <br />zones. <br />44% Limited demand <br />Conflict with Envision Eugene <br />3 <br />Revise land use code to <br />allow for development of <br />more diverse “missing <br />middle” housing types. <br />82% <br />Yes, yes, yes! <br />Increase diversity and availability <br />while preserving UGB <br />Middle housing can be done in <br />R2,3,4. This is only about up <br />zoning R1 <br />Conflict with comprehensive <br />Envision Eugene plan <br />3 -A <br />Enable by-right housing <br />options, including <br />duplexes, triplexes, <br />cottage clusters, and <br />smaller homes on <br />smaller lot sizes in all <br />single-family zones. <br />86% <br />Need to increase density in <br />neighborhoods. <br />More diversity is good, more <br />choice <br />Make it easier <br />Conflict with comprehensive <br />Envision Eugene plan <br />Metro plan density levels would <br />be exceeded <br />3 -B <br />Enable by-right housing <br />options along key <br />corridors. <br />93% <br />Housing options are important <br />for people of all ages. <br />Increases supply and availability. <br />This adds diversity on corridors <br />where it's not controversial, <br />more palatable. <br /> <br />3 -C <br />Enable more missing <br />middle in green fields or <br />large subdivisions. <br />55% <br />4 <br />Revise land use code to <br />ease development <br />standards for adaptive <br />re-use (converting an <br />existing non-residential <br />building—such as a <br />82% <br />Great idea! <br />Makes sense. <br />Flexibility. <br />In R1 would depend on what's <br />allowed. <br />Is code really the barrier? <br />December 10, 2018, Work Session - Item 2