Laserfiche WebLink
Community Response to Online Survey Following 11/28/18 Meeting <br />95 <br /> <br /> <br />SummarySummarySummarySummary of Emailed Feedback From November 14 Meeting of Emailed Feedback From November 14 Meeting of Emailed Feedback From November 14 Meeting of Emailed Feedback From November 14 Meeting <br /> <br />PG 1-25 - Paul Conte <br />• Critique of strategies and options including whether/how they would be effective to addressing <br />problems of cost, lack of data to support, and negative impacts of some options. <br />• Promotion of Opportunity Siting as option with supporting explanation/links. <br />• Notes the challenge in the ways that market forces make affordability difficult and call for more <br />attention to options that will help pay for subsidized units. <br />• Suggests new options for the group’s consideration. <br />• Lists specific concerns regarding alignment of options with Envision Eugene pillars and <br />neighborhood livability. <br />• Includes attachments with documents from previous community groups (Mixed-Use Re <br />Development Sub-Group). Predominantly advocating for mixed-use high-density housing <br />options along transportation corridors and guidance on infill compatibility standards. <br />PG 26-111- Bill Aspegren <br />• Broadly concerned that neighborhoods and livability interests are under-represented. <br />• Critique that terms are poorly defined. <br />• Critique of specific options (see complete text for details). <br />• Support for mixed-use and higher density home construction with construction of commercial <br />units. <br />• Specific comments on stimulating ADU construction and suggestions regarding Urban Reserves. <br />• Includes attachments: <br />o PG 28-79 -“Metro Residential Preference” 2014 draft of study prepared by DHM <br />Research. Data from residents of Multnomah, Washington, Clark, and Clackamas <br />Introduction <br />In addition to the online survey, community members also have the option to email the Eugene <br />Housing Tools address to provide feedback. While the online form asks for specific feedback <br />which can be easily compiled and synthesized, emailed feedback tends to be broader, longer, <br />and thus, more difficult to summarize. The emails summarized below include those sent to the <br />HousingTools@eugene-or.gov mailbox that is monitored by City staff and were requested to be <br />shared with the Working Group members. Given the extensive content included in these emails, <br />the Working Group facilitator has identified key points as a means to help interested parties find <br />the feedback they want to read more about. The purpose in making this list isn’t to limit or filter <br />information but rather to make extensive content more accessible and easier to navigate. Parties <br />are, of course, welcome to read the emailed feedback in their entireties. <br />City staff and the facilitator have not vetted any of the community feedback for accuracy. <br />December 12, 2018, Work Session - Item 2