Agenda Packet 12-12-18 Work Session

Home Browse Search

Community Response to Online Survey Following 11/28/18 Meeting 97 PG 164-166 – Paul Conte • Critique of Strategic Economics data presented on 11/14 meeting. • Specific concern that data regarding likely volume/impact of options wasn’t included in the presentation. • Critique that data was one-sided (over-representing developer interests) • Suggestion regarding ADUs and low production in areas where regulations are less stringent (but production still low). • Critique that the data, while well presented, wasn’t specific enough (too high level) to be useful, lacked adequate citations/identification of sources, left out details regarding student households, and was overall biased/un-useful. Full Text Full text of these emails is available online at https://www.eugene- or.gov/DocumentCenter/View/43659/Emails-to-Housing-Tools-and-Strategies-Working-Group-by-11- 26 Summary of ESummary of ESummary of ESummary of Emailed Feedback from Nomailed Feedback from Nomailed Feedback from Nomailed Feedback from November 28 Meetingvember 28 Meetingvember 28 Meetingvember 28 Meeting Eben Fodor • Suggests that the data presented on 11/14 should focus the group’s attention on those with the lowest income. • Suggests that data regarding cost burdened households is skewed because of students and retirees. Both may show limited income but are still able to live comfortably. • Requests that the City break down data to assess magnitude of the housing problem more accurately. • Suggests consideration of the national market and how the local market compared with the national market. Zondie Zinke • “62% of residents in Vienna live in publicly owned social housing—please consider!” NOTE- Given the brevity of the message, Zondie’s email has been included here in its entirety. Full text of these emails is available online at https://www.eugene- or.gov/DocumentCenter/View/43792/Emails-to-Housing-Tools-and-Strategies-Working-Group-by-12-2 December 12, 2018, Work Session - Item 2