My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 12-12-18 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
City Council
>
2018
>
12-12-2018
>
Agenda Packet 12-12-18 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2018 3:42:55 PM
Creation date
12/12/2018 3:36:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/12/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
43 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Background <br />In Eugene low vacancy rates for both rentals and ownership properties reflect strong demand for housing, <br />and trends show production of some housing types has declined over the last several years. This decline is <br />especially true for apartment projects and ADUs. It’s not completely clear what has caused the drop-off, <br />but barriers to housing production cited by developers in Eugene include: <br />• City fees, project delays and uncertainty in the City process caused by appeals, and <br />• High costs for building material, labor, and land. <br />The City can play a role in reducing or removing financial and regulatory barriers to housing, but tradeoffs <br />include City revenues and financial resource constraints since fees imposed on new development provide <br />revenue for Eugene’s utility, transportation, and park networks, and for the fiscal sustainability of city <br />service delivery. It should be noted that Eugene already waives System Development Charges for <br />Affordable housing developments and has a centralized “one-stop-shop” model for all permitting requests. <br /> <br />What We Heard: Costs of Development <br />Strategic Economics interviewed developers and City of Eugene staff to understand costs and processes. <br />What we heard: <br />• Under current conditions it is very difficult to make a reasonable return building Missing Middle <br />housing types, which is one reason why very few of them are being built. Some developers are <br />delivering these more innovative housing products under current regulations because they’re <br />personally invested in the end result (ex: building an ADU for a family member) or because their <br />moral interest in delivering the product type outweighs the fact that the project resulted in a limited <br />return or financial loss for them. <br />• Building permits for townhome projects take too long. Townhome permits and subdivision <br />requirements are cumbersome and cause costly delays. <br />• The Planned Unit Development (PUD) process has the potential to significantly delay projects. <br />• The Planned Unit Development (PUD) and appeals processes add delays and cost to multifamily <br />developments with three or more units in many cases. A PUD process is required of projects with 3 <br />or more units in areas zoned “low-density residential” (R-1) in most cases. This process opens the <br />project up to public appeal. Similarly, an adjustment makes a project appealable by the public. <br />• SDCs for ADUs and other Missing Middle housing types are not scaled on building size. Developers <br />noted that SDC and permitting fees, along with EWEB requirements that each unit have separate <br />water meters and sewer hookups, add significant costs to unit types that do not have the same <br />revenue potential as single family. <br />• At least one developer noted a specific project that would not have worked without the Multi-Unit <br />Property Tax Exemption (MUPTE) benefit. <br /> <br /> <br />Strategy 2: Reduce cost and time burden for development of housing <br />. <br />December 12, 2018, Work Session - Item 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.