My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 12-12-18 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
City Council
>
2018
>
12-12-2018
>
Agenda Packet 12-12-18 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2018 3:42:55 PM
Creation date
12/12/2018 3:36:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/12/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
79 <br /> <br />Qualitative Data Regarding the Content and Next Steps <br />Comments regarding the list of recommendations <br />• I Think CET needs work incorporating ideas that were shared. Largely supported but the devil is <br />in the details. <br />• I felt the economic report was very important and hope the Council and Mayor will really look at <br />what a “neutral” party reported. <br />• Short on nuance and needs to be viewed more holistically but there was a lot of positives about it <br />and many good ideas were included. <br />• Support for organizations that care and help for affordable housing. <br />• Need more clarification on some. <br />• Need more facts and data. <br />• Comprehensive list. <br />• 3 and 3A are very depressing. They really spell the deterioration of our close in older <br />neighborhoods (which down the road will lead to pushing out the UGB someday for new R1 <br />neighborhoods). The demand for market-rate single family houses is great. <br />Comments regarding hopes/expectations for Council <br />• Please act in the interest of the future of the city. Please ACT and do not ignore <br />recommendations here in favor of N.A. few <br />• Enough process. Don’t let people use “dissatisfaction with process” to be used as a roadblock by <br />people who just don’t agree with the idea. We need action. <br />• This is their opportunity for ACTION. Move things forward through the public process. <br />• That they act! <br />• DO something!!!! <br />• The topic is incredibly complex and I’m not sure all will be successful about getting at the root <br />causes of the issues. <br />• Think of what is best for the whole community as well as our least economically advantaged. <br />• Be mindful of process moving forward. <br />• More in depth working groups. <br />• No engagement with priorities, severity or sizability. Hard to do this in the group but Council <br />needs this. <br />• Economic development and equity impacts. Prioritize with actions. <br />• Let’s do this! With many of these discussion points. <br /> <br />What will you tell community members about this process? <br />• This was productive and nuanced. If you weren’t present, you might not understand that. <br />• Majority of sides were represented. <br />• Good, open process <br />• I appreciate the work and professionalism of city staff. <br />• Council uses this to act, great, it will have been worth the time. <br />• It’s important to get involved and learn about our community! <br />• Wait and see <br />• We need more material from knowledgeable sources. <br />• Not very useful. Outcomes were predictable from the beginning based on the people chosen for <br />this process and those NOT allowed to join. <br />December 12, 2018, Work Session - Item 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.