My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 12/01/03 WS
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2003
>
CC Minutes - 12/01/03 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:32:57 AM
Creation date
7/15/2005 3:48:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/1/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Laurence remarked that the plan's purpose was two-fold: 1) a visionary plan that built upon the <br />downtown vision; and 2) a refinement plan. She said as a visionary plan it characterized downtown as a <br />strong, active urban center and committed the City to a strategic approach in using economic tools to <br />promote desired development. She related that the visionary aspects of the plan encouraged public art, <br />promoted nearby nature areas, and addressed the downtown riverfront. She said the refinement plan aspects <br />embedded policies and implementation strategies that were more pragmatic and would be used to guide land <br />use decisions and investments downtown, such as redesignation and rezoning of the train depot area from <br />industrial use to commercial. She noted that combining visionary and pragmatic elements in the plan <br />illustrated the strong collaboration between the Planning Division and the Development Division. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson congratulated staff on completing the plan and noted that its tone was positive and identified <br />strengths that could be built upon, rather than simply identifying problems. She said she appreciated the <br />inclusion of a section on safety. She expressed concern over the availability of conference space and <br />encouraged collaboration with the Convention and Visitors Association of Lane County, the Lane County <br />Fair Board, and other entities in planning improvements. She commented that her other special interests <br />were entrances and landmarks to signify arrival in downtown and river connections. She observed that <br />water and light were both important to attracting people to downtown and maintaining interest. <br /> <br />Ms. Meisner commented on the lengthy process to develop the plan update and expressed satisfaction with <br />the result, which combined vision with practicality. He said he hoped the plan would not be adopted and <br />then ~put on a shelf," and asked that the subject of downtown development appear before the council on a <br />regular basis and continuing basis. He noted the many examples of possible projects and anticipated that <br />staff would bring plans back to the council. <br /> <br />Referring to problems encountered with the demolition of the Agripac facility, Mr. Meisner asked if <br />language in the plan relating to historic issues or the map identifying potential historic properties would <br />cause delays or interfere in any way with redevelopment or the City's decisions about buildings such as City <br />Hall. Ms. Laurence said language in the plan had been softened because of those types of concerns and staff <br />was working with legal counsel to assure that language was appropriate. She added that nothing in the plan <br />designated properties such as City Hall as historic sites, only as properties of potential historic interest. <br /> <br />Mr. Yeiter elaborated that the plan and map recognized the importance of certain historic structures <br />contributing the character of downtown and making special places in civic architecture. He said the intent <br />of the map was to identify those properties in anticipation of development, but if the council felt the tool was <br />too restrictive for future development, direction could be given to staff to pare down or eliminate some <br />elements. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly thanked everyone involved in developing the plan, which he agreed combined both visionary and <br />practical aspects and identified strengths and assets in the downtown area. Referring to Mr. Meisner's <br />comments, he noted that adoption of the plan would only adopt the policies, not the implementation <br />strategies, and urged that more of the strategies were included in the policies. He related a conversation with <br />a downtown property owner in which the question was asked: What would someone walking through <br />downtown see that was different as a result of the policies? He said the vision to which the plan aspired was <br />commendable and asked staff to consider what implementation strategies could be included as policies or <br />whether a downtown work plan that would be formally adopted could be developed in order to make a <br />commitment to change. Mr. Taylor said a high priority on implementing the vision and revitalizing <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 1, 2003 Page 3 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.