Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Taylor agreed that revitalizing downtown was a strategic issue and that all City departments had a <br />contribution to make to implementation strategies. He said that staff would development responses before <br />the public hearing to issues not resolved during the discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ asked why the Lane County Historical Museum was being encouraged to relocate downtown as <br />one of the implementation strategies. Ms. Laurence replied that the museum intended to move and staff felt <br />a downtown location was desirable. Mr. Kelly added that the museum's current facility did not have <br />adequate storage or climate control. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly gave as an example of the need for prioritization and historic preservation the fact that the house <br />that Mary Skinner lived in following Eugene Skinner's death was still standing, but had no historic <br />protection. <br /> <br />C. WORK SESSION: Central Area Transportation Study (CATS) <br /> <br />Transportation Planning Engineer Chris Henry stated that the first CATS was adopted in 1987 and helped <br />provide the transportation and parking element for downtown. He said it was updated in 1993 to improve <br />access and circulation for alternative modes and since that time many of the strategies have been imple- <br />mented. He described the coordination of the CATS update with that of the Downtown Plan and thanked <br />those involved, including councilors, planning commissioners, City staff, and other agencies, for their <br />participation. <br /> <br />Continuing, Mr. Henry said the significance of the update was the addition to CATS of policies related to <br />the Downtown Plan and the Great Streets concept. He said CATS contained a more robust look at <br />conversion of street operations from one-way to two-way and the visioning process had confirmed a desire <br />to make it easier for people to get to and through the downtown area. He said the disconnected arrangement <br />of one-way and two-way streets made circulation through town confusing and a consulting firm was hired to <br />assist staff in analyzing the downtown traffic system and produce the recommendations for conversion of <br />Willamette Street, 8th Avenue, 10th Avenue, Lawrence Street, Lincoln Street, and Charnelton Street. <br /> <br />Mr. Henry said the agenda item summary included recommendations from the Planning Commission, with <br />which the staff agreed. He noted that Mr. Kelly had pointed out a discrepancy regarding Policy #3 relating <br />to system development charges (SDC) and a geographical component that was no longer relevant. He said <br />staff concurred and that section would be stricken from the final document. He announced there would be a <br />public hearing on January 26, 2004, in conjunction with a similar public hearing for the Downtown Plan. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor asked why all streets were not being proposed for conversion to two-way operation, instead of <br />sections of some streets, leaving gaps in two-way operations. She suggested that the Farmers Market be <br />consulted about concerns regarding the impact of converting 8th Avenue to two-way operation. She asked <br />why there was no stop sign for vehicles at the intersection of Willamette Street and 12th Avenue. She <br />commented that 6th and 7th avenues were State highways, presented major barriers to pedestrians and <br />suggested that the City could negotiate with the State for better regulation of traffic speed. She also <br />suggested that staff consult pedestrians, those in wheelchairs, and bicycle riders to identify problem areas. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 1, 2003 Page 6 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />