Laserfiche WebLink
then leave, as the airline had done in the early 1990s. He advocated for a discussion of commitment when <br />such proposals were being made to business entities. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman supported the objective of bringing additional service to the City of Eugene. She agreed <br />with Councilor Pap6's points, adding that only last week there had been an article in the Eugene paper that <br />declared Delta Airlines to be on the brink of insolvency. She asserted that, as the City was taking on a risk, <br />so should the airline. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling echoed the points made by Councilors Meisner and Solomon. He underscored that the <br />money in question was one-time General Fund money that had been set aside for a specific purpose. He <br />noted that the last two times the funding had been used for this purpose, it had been a success. He remarked <br />that the airline had initially proposed a guarantee of $2 million and, through negotiation, the City had <br />reached agreement on the present figure. He added that the business community was also taking on a <br />financial risk. He recognized the intent behind Councilor Pap6's motion, but urged the council to send a <br />clear message that the council was behind the effort to secure Delta Airlines. <br /> <br /> Councilor Nathanson, seconded by Councilor Pap~, moved to extend the meeting by <br /> five minutes. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson conveyed her appreciation of the intent of the motion. However, she said the motion <br />was late in coming and the council had not been able to analyze the implications or details of the motion. <br />Negotiations were already in place and, as such, she would not support the motion at this time. She noted <br />the council had asked the airport to be a self-supporting service and averred that should this be what the <br />airport needed to achieve this, it should be granted and would ultimately become an investment in future <br />budgets. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey indicated that, should there be a tie vote, he would vote in opposition to the motion. He <br />reported that he had just returned from a all-day meeting in Portland on ways the State of Oregon could <br />remain competitive. He asserted that Eugene must make itself accessible or it would lose the opportunity to <br />provide resources for all of the services the council had just talked about providing in the budget the <br />council had debated for 90 minutes. He opined that the City was a supply-and-demand community and the <br />council did not have the luxury of dictating the terms of the debate. Though it would be nice to set the <br />standards in the negotiation, he said the airline was holding ~the chips." He complimented Councilor <br />Bettman for the motion she made regarding incentive funding for the hospital site. He likened that motion <br />to the proposed revenue guarantee, stating that both sought to make the City more competitive. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor urged the council not to give this direction to staff at this time. He called it the wrong <br />signal and predicted it would place the tentative agreement in jeopardy and eliminate the window of <br />opportunity to provide access to Salt Lake City and other eastward destinations. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly objected to characterizing support for Councilor Papa's motion as being opposed to the <br />provision of incentives. He reiterated that the motion was only to attain a longer commitment from the <br />airline in return for the incentives. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the vote on the motion was a tie, 4:4; councilors Bettman, Kelly, Tay- <br /> lor, and Pap~ voting in favor, and councilors Solomon, Meisner, Nathanson, and Pol- <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 1, 2003 Page 18 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />