Laserfiche WebLink
Public involvement efforts include outreach, community design workshops (CDWs), open houses, <br />speakers’ bureau events, Board meetings, committees, and agency involvement. Strategies used <br />to keep the public and agencies informed include the LTD website, four newsletters, and booths at <br />special events, many of which are intended to provide innovative ways of involving members of <br />the public who do not usually participate in projects like this. Material and resources are available <br />in Spanish and can be made to meet ADA requirements. <br /> <br />LTD worked closely with staff from the City of Eugene, Lane Council of Governments, WEEE <br />Corridor Committee members, West Eugene Collaborative (WEC), and the public to finalize the <br />Purpose, Need, Goal and Objectives (PNGO) Statement and the Final Range of Alternatives. <br />LTD held two public open house meetings, one public agency resource meeting, and several <br />outreach meetings with individuals and groups (such as city neighborhood associations). <br /> <br />Comments received during the Scoping phase were used by the Board of Directors, in <br />consultation with the FTA, in making their decision on the project’s Purpose and Need/Goals and <br />Objectives and Range of Alternatives in March 2008 (Attachments 3 and 4). This included the <br />decision to eliminate the option of an EmX route along West 11th between Jefferson and <br />Chambers. Due to the unlikelihood of future dedicated EmX lanes on West 11th in this segment, <br />this part of the alternative was taken out of the final Range of Alternatives. <br /> <br />In addition, the Scoping Process included public review and comment on the proposed range of <br />environmental disciplines to be studied in an EIS. The Board of Directors adopted a Proposed <br />Range of Environmental Disciplines as part of its Scoping actions in March 2008. Table 2 <br />provides a listing of the Proposed Range Environmental Disciplines for the project. A description <br />of the impacts assessed within each discipline is provided as Attachment 5. <br /> <br />Process From Here <br />In order to conduct an analysis of the alternative and length alignments, a conceptual engineering- <br />level design must be prepared. This provides enough specification of how the alignment would <br />operate to allow the impact analysis to take place. <br /> <br />This process has begun with the creation of one or more sketch-level alternative design concepts <br />for each alignment, except for the Amazon Alignment, which is discussed below. To engage the <br />public in a discussion of these sketch-level designs, LTD held five Community Design Workshops <br />in July and August. A Resource Agency workshop will be held on September 9, 2008. Each <br />workshop had more than 20 non-LTD staff members in attendance. Over 100 comments were <br />collected for each alternative at each workshop. Table 1 below provides an overview of the <br />workshop details. <br /> <br />The public input on the alternative design options will be used by staff to refine the sketch-level <br />designs as a basis for creating the conceptual designs employed as part of the analysis of <br />alternatives. This refinement process will include consideration of each design option to: <br />? <br /> Avoid and minimize impacts, <br />? <br /> Address traffic conditions, and <br />? <br /> Optimize operations and design <br /> <br />A “Report Back” on the process, presentation material, and public feedback at the workshops will <br />be presented at an open house to be held on October 20, 2008. <br /> <br />The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) is expected to be completed by mid-2009. <br />Following a 60-day public review period, the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) will be selected in <br />late 2009. By mid-2010, the Final EIS is expected to be prepared and published, including <br /> 3 <br /> <br />