Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Ballew said ODOT had gone through a lengthy process. She was not certain what would be <br />accomplished by leaving the record open. She underscored that when the bridge reached the design phase <br />there would be more opportunity for review and for public input. She stated that it would assist ODOT if <br />the elected officials could allow the process to proceed. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked if ODOT had looked at alternative plans for the plan, such as a four-lane bridge. <br />She wondered what that would have cost. Ms. O’Donnell did not have the actual cost analysis, but she <br />believed that the applicant did respond to the issue and had determined that the design of two bridges would <br />create less of an environmental and an economic impact. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to leave the record open for seven <br />days for the City of Eugene. The motion passed unanimously, 5:0. <br /> <br />Mayor Leiken called for a motion from the councilors of Springfield. None were offered. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dwyer asked when this would end and whether they would have to convene another meeting <br />of the Joint Elected Officials. Commissioner Stewart noted that the third reading of the ordinance was <br />scheduled for the following day. Assistant County Counsel Stephen Vorhes clarified that if the record was <br />left open it meant the hearing was closed and the deliberation or continuation of the reading could extend to <br />the point where the record was closed, staff would be allowed to respond to questions and answers, and then <br />each entity could take up deliberation at their respective times. He said unless there was a desire to continue <br />the hearing, all that needed to be considered would be when the next meeting was scheduled to deliberate on <br />the ordinance before the Board. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stewart ascertained from legal counsel that leaving the record open did not affect the three <br />dates scheduled for the different jurisdictions to take action. <br /> <br />Commissioner Green asked what complications might arise if one entity closed the record and another kept it <br />open. Ms. Brotherton responded that it was not impossible. She said if the record was not left open for <br />everyone, the entity for which the record would be closed would not have access to further information. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dwyer, seconded by Commissioner Sorensonn, moved to keep the record <br />open for seven days for the Lane County Board of Commissioners with an additional five <br />days for the Oregon Department of Transportation to respond. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said the Eugene council motion was for only seven days. She felt that ODOT could <br />respond to staff if necessary. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dwyer amended his motion so that the record would only be open for seven <br />days. The second was amenable to the change. The motion passed unanimously, 5:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Wylie moved to keep the record open for the Springfield City Council. The mo- <br />tion died for lack of a second. <br /> <br />Close Public Hearing <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman closed the public hearing for the Eugene City Council. <br /> <br />Mayor Leiken closed the public hearing for the Springfield City Council. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Joint Elected Officials— June 24, 2008 Page 7 <br /> Lane Board of County Commissioners and Eugene and Springfield City Councils <br />