My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 1-23-19 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2019
>
01-23-19
>
Agenda Packet 1-23-19 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2019 2:12:25 PM
Creation date
1/18/2019 2:08:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/23/2019
Signature_Date
1/23/2019
CMO_Effective_Date
1/23/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CLEAR & OBJECTIVE HOUSING: APPROVAL CRITERIA UPDATE <br /> <br /> <br />November 13, 2018 DRAFT Preferred Concepts Report: Significant Issues Page 21 of 59 <br /> <br />Significant Issues: Summary Table of Preferred Concepts <br />Significant Issue Preferred Concept Reason <br />COS‐01 Clear & Objective <br />Compatibility <br />Add compatibility criterion to site reviews, conditional use and <br />planned unit development applications that applies to higher‐ <br />intensity development abutting lower intensity development— <br />include transition buffers (setbacks, height limitation areas, and <br />landscape screening) that are scalable <br />Effectiveness, <br />Consistency <br />COS‐02 30‐Foot Buffer Requirement <br />For PUDs <br />Replace with new criterion from COS‐01 Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS‐03 20 Percent Slope Grading <br />Prohibition <br />Remove and rely on COS‐13 Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS‐04 One Acre Accessible Open <br />Space For PUDs <br />Revise required distance from open space from ¼ mile to ½ mile <br />and make onsite requirement scalable <br />Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS‐05 Limitation Over 900 Feet For <br />PUDs <br />Revise to allow less intensive development above 900’ (2.5 <br />units/acre) and include more stringent tree/vegetation <br />preservation requirements <br />Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS‐06 Ridgeline Setback For PUDs Revise to make setback applicable to areas above 900’ elevation.Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS‐07 40 Percent Open Space <br />Requirement For PUDs <br />Revise to 30% and clarify language based on intent of relevant <br />South Hills Study policy <br />Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS‐08 Emergency Response Add criterion to require letter from Fire Marshal’s office stating <br />that project complies with Eugene Fire Code for site reviews, <br />conditional use and planned unit development applications; <br />apply criterion to partitions and subdivisions per COS‐14 <br />Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS‐09 Conditional Use <br />Requirement <br />Keep process, add compatibility criterion from COS‐01 Effectiveness <br />COS‐10 Partition Tree Preservation Remove criterion Efficiency, <br />Consistency <br />COS‐11 Tree Preservation <br />Consideration <br />Add criterion that requires minimum preservation and mitigation <br />and implement a rating scale that takes into account tree type, <br />health, size and location. <br />Effectiveness <br />COS‐12 Site Review Requirement Keep process, add compatibility criterion from COS‐01 Effectiveness <br />COS‐13 Geotechnical Requirement Revise existing criterion to address additional risk factors Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS‐14 19 Lot Rule—Motor Vehicle <br />Dispersal <br />Rely on COS‐08 (apply COS‐08 to partitions and subdivisions) Efficiency, <br />Effectiveness <br />COS‐15 Traffic Impact Defer to Public Works Transportation project getting underway Effectiveness <br />COS‐16 PUD Type III Process Hold for future land use code improvement project Efficiency <br />COS‐17 Does Not Hamper Provision <br />Of Public Open Space <br />Moved to COM‐18 Effectiveness <br />COS‐18 Arborist And Landscape <br />Architect Requirement <br />No change (Continue to require arborist on PUD design team) Efficiency <br />COS‐19 Street Standards <br />Modifications <br />Add clear exceptions and add adjustment option Efficiency <br />COS‐20 Pedestrian Definition Use ORS definition with minor refinement Effectiveness <br /> <br />January 23, 2019, Work Session – Item 1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.