My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 1-23-19 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2019
>
01-23-19
>
Agenda Packet 1-23-19 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2019 2:12:25 PM
Creation date
1/18/2019 2:08:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/23/2019
Signature_Date
1/23/2019
CMO_Effective_Date
1/23/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Eugene Planning Commission Feedback Summary on Batch 2 Issues <br />Planning Commission Work Sessions: December 10 and December 11, 2018 <br /> <br />Draft proposed preferred concepts are conceptual only. Preferred concepts are intended to narrow the focus of the <br />code writing process. Additional feedback from the Planning Commission offered guidance, suggestions, and flagged <br />potential concerns without modifying the proposed preferred concepts as outlined in the Draft Preferred Concepts <br />Report. This input will be considered when drafting proposed land use code changes as part of Phase 3. <br />Significant Issue Proposed Preferred Concept Planning Commission Feedback <br />COS-03 20 Percent Slope <br />Grading Prohibition <br />Remove and rely on COS-13 Support for proposed preferred <br />concept <br />COS-04 One Acre Accessible <br />Open Space For PUDs <br />Revise required distance from open <br />space from ¼ mile to ½ mile and make <br />onsite requirement scalable <br />Support for proposed preferred <br />concept <br />COS-05 Limitation Over 900 <br />Feet For PUDs <br />Revise to allow less intensive <br />development above 900’ (2.5 <br />units/acre) and include more stringent <br />tree/vegetation preservation <br />requirements <br />Support for proposed preferred <br />concept <br />COS-06 Ridgeline Setback For <br />PUDs <br />Revise to make setback applicable to <br />areas above 900’ elevation. <br />Support for proposed preferred <br />concept <br />COS-07 40 Percent Open <br />Space Requirement <br />For PUDs <br />Revise to 30% and clarify language <br />based on intent of relevant South Hills <br />Study policy <br />Support to remove requirement and <br />rely on COS-04 (Accessible Open Space <br />for PUDs) and existing open space <br />requirements for multi-family <br />developments <br />COS-11 Tree Preservation <br />Consideration <br />Add criterion that requires minimum <br />preservation and mitigation and <br />implement a rating scale that takes into <br />account tree type, health, size and <br />location. <br />Support for proposed preferred <br />concept <br />COS-13 Geotechnical <br />Requirement <br />Revise existing criterion to address <br />additional risk factors <br />Support for proposed preferred <br />concept <br />COS-19 Street Standards <br />Modifications <br />Add clear exceptions and add <br />adjustment option <br />Support for proposed preferred <br />concept <br /> <br />Attachment B <br />January 23, 2019, Work Session – Item 1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.