Item B: Meeting w/Police Comm. - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Attachment E Oversight System Decision Points: Commissioner Voting Record The Police Commission adopted its recommendations for the police oversight model over the course of four meetings in June and July, 2005. To the extent possible, members used consensus to make final decisions. However, where there were substantive issues on the fimction of the model, or disagreement with some portion of the process, a formal vote was taken. Provided below are the results of votes pertaining to the conceptual model that were taken during this decision-making period. TOPIC DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND INFORMATION VOTE VOTING AGAINST Dual Complaint Community members and EPD personnel may file complaints with 7:2 Bettman, Denner Intake Model auditor's office or with internal affairs office, but auditor's office is (vote taken June 23l) responsible for all classification decisions (original proposal from Complaint Intake Committee to Police Commission) Alternative Convenes a joint task team to develop recommendations for more 9:0 Resolution Options formalized procedures for alternative resolution to complaints and role of (vote taken June 23) advocates Anonymous Formalizes procedures for acceptance of anonymous and third-party 9:0 Complaints (vote complaints taken June 23rd) Requesting Sworn Requires complainant to attest to the veracity of complaint where 8:1 Denner Statements (vote criminal actions are alleged taken 6/23) Complaint Dismissal Develops procedures for when complaints can be justifiably dismissed 9:0 Warrant/Records Recommends process for auditor ability to notify complainant of 8:1 Bettman Check outstanding warrants Auditor Function Description of authority and role of professional auditor in hybrid 9:0 (vote taken June 282) oversight system George Bennett and Andrea Ortiz absent at June 23ra meeting; Neil Van Steenbergen left early George Bennett, Andrea Orfiz and Floyd Prozanski absent at June 28th meeting