Laserfiche WebLink
Re: Civilian Review <br />June 7, 2005 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />advisory to the Council and have authority to dictate or affect the outcomes of particular cases.2 <br />If a change in the Charter were to provide such authority to the Council, the board it appoints <br />would be a "governing body" under Oregon's public meetings laws. ORS. 192.610(3). <br />Therefore, the board would have to conduct its business in an open session except when.there is a <br />specific statutory basis for an executive session, which presents a series of issues that are <br />described more fully below.3 For the purposes of this opinion, we assume that the CRB is <br />advisory to the City Council. <br /> <br /> B. Involvement in investigations: Participation in ongoing community impact <br /> cases and closed case review <br /> <br /> The CRB would be involved in investigations at the pre-adjudication stage only when <br />those cases meet predetermined criteria (community impact cases) and then only if the review <br />board votes to participate. The CRB may recommend an outside investigation, but that decision <br />ultimately lies with the Police Chief according to predetermined criteria. <br /> <br /> All other cases would be reviewed by the CRB only after the investigation is complete <br />and the adjudication decision is made ("closed case" review). The CRB may conduct the review <br />based upon pre-determined criteria, upon the recommendation of the auditor or at the request of <br />the complainant. The board may review the case files within the parameters of the open <br />meetings and public records laws and then forward its recommendations or concerns about <br />policies and procedures to the Police Chief(or to the City Council or Police Commission, <br />depending on reporting guidelines). <br /> <br /> As discussed above with regard to the auditor's role, the CRB may review a completed <br />criminal investigation into matters that are also the subject of an internal investigation, but may <br /> <br /> ~ Under the current Charter, the City Council could appoint a CRB to advise the Council <br />on matters of policy related to investigation and adjudication of complaints about police conduct. <br />In this scenario, the CRB could review closed case files and make recommendations about <br />policies and procedures related to investigations and adjudication standards and outcomes. The <br />Charter would prohibit the CRB from involving itself in investigations and adjudications prior to <br />their completion. <br /> <br /> 3 The City Manager could appoint a Civilian Review Board whose role is to review <br /> <br />investigations in certain cases before adjudication and to provide advice to the City Manager and <br />Police Chief on the appropriate outcome. Because the review board would be advisory to the <br />City Manager and thus would not be a "governing body," the board would not be subject to the <br />requirements of Oregon open meetings laws. <br /> <br /> <br />