Laserfiche WebLink
audio technology. The committee reconvened to respond to these and other outstanding issues and <br />developed the following additional project recommendations: <br /> <br /> Provide maximum recording coverage by installing equipment in all patrol and supervisor <br /> vehicles <br /> · Purchase equipment that includes the ability to retain video captured just prior to system <br /> activation to allow review of actions that precede event in addition to the event itself (pre-event <br /> recording) <br /> · Allocate at least 0.5 FTE for increased staffing level during initial implementation and for <br /> ongoing system management <br /> · Provide thorough training to ensure that equipment operation procedures are understood and <br /> successfully implemented <br /> · Articulate in the equipment request for proposal the values of high quality video imaging, <br /> integrity of data, reliability and durability, internal auditing capabilities and upgradeability <br /> <br />The draft policy was approved at the February meeting and then used in securing Telecomm Tax funds <br />for the project and in developing vendor proposals. Once a digital video system is selected, some <br />portions of the policy will be updated to refine procedures that are specific to the technology in place. <br />The committee will reconvene to assist the department in finalizing the policy and recommend the <br />types of data that will be useful in an annual evaluation of the project. <br /> <br />Uniform Standards <br />In FY 04, a task group was convened to explore options to ensure that Eugene police officers are easily <br />distinguishable from other public safety agencies in Eugene, campus security and private security <br />employees. An Intemet search on the topic indicated that other cities have enacted ordinances and/or <br />state legislation to address this issue. A two-prong approach was agreed to whereby a draft ordinance <br />was prepared for presentation to the council and a modification to ORS to broaden the definition of <br />criminal impersonation was developed. <br /> <br />During this process, the commission discovered that a city ordinance on uniform standards could not <br />be lawfully applied to the University of Oregon Department of Public Safety (DPS) officers. <br />Nonetheless, commissioners agreed that an ordinance focusing on private security entities would be a <br />proactive measure and recommended that the City seek a cooperative agreement with the university to <br />mitigate the appearance similarities between EPD and DPS officers. <br /> <br />A City Council work session to discuss the merits of the uniform standards ordinance was held on May <br />18, 2005. Council agreed to move forward with the draft ordinance and scheduled a public hearing for <br />May 23. There was no public opposition to the ordinance at the public hearing and council <br />unanimously agreed to adopt the ordinance at that meeting. The ordinance will go into effect in <br />January 2006. <br /> <br />In a related effort, Senator Prozanski introduced legislation on behalf of the Police Commission to <br />expand existing statutory language on criminal impersonation of a peace officer. SB 547 was passed <br />in both houses and was signed by the Govemor in June. <br /> <br />2005 Annual Report Page 3 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />