Laserfiche WebLink
staff time and energy for the remainder of the year to be spent fleshing out the shorter terms items first, <br />then the mid- and long-term items later. He expected to have a well-developed and adopted strategic plan <br />going into the next budget year. He reviewed the organization of the strategic plan and noted that <br />proposed initiatives were categorized in one of three ways: <br /> <br /> · Improve organizational capacity <br /> · Improve organizational effectiveness <br /> · Improve organizational accountability <br /> <br />Chief Lehner highlighted the following action items and provided updated information: <br /> <br /> #2. Obtain Oregon Accreditation Association (OAA) accreditation - meeting scheduled on July 21, <br /> 2005, with the OAA board to obtain application materials. The OAA process is directly tied to <br /> the national process and there was some controversy developing over those national standards <br /> and process. The outcome of that controversy could have some affect on the OAA process and <br /> timeframe. <br /> <br /> #3 Complete and consider Police Commission recommendations. Develop and implement new <br /> complaint handling process - some recommendations tied to Internal Affairs processes, which <br /> was a department initiative; however, the subject of governance and civilian oversight was also <br /> an ongoing initiative outside the direct scope of the strategic plan. <br /> <br /> #8 Develop a neighborhood-based community policy strategy - continue to meet with neighbor- <br /> hood groups and the Patrol Division was exploring the issue of potential districting and geo- <br /> graphic assignment of commanders. Much work had already taken place and progress had been <br /> made and district boundaries would be available for discussion by September 2005. <br /> <br /> # 11 Develop a supplemental basic trainingprogram - effective January 1, 2007, the State would <br /> change how basic training of police officers was certified and could profoundly affect how the <br /> City trained its officers. The new process would be challenging to implement but could provide <br /> benefits as well. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy solicited council questions and comments. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said that the success of the plan would ultimately be judged by how the department was <br />perceived by the council, police staff and the broader community two or three years in the future. He <br />commented that the City's preliminary action plan response looked good and was pleased that many <br />changes were already being implemented and neighborhood-based community policing was being <br />pursued. He asked how the staffing workload analysis would fit with the strategic plan and the policing <br />model embraced by the community. Chief Lehner responded that the strategic plan was attempting to <br />prioritize the types of responses or calls the department had and tie that fairly directly to the budget and <br />the resources required to handle any particular type of call. He gave the decision about whether to <br />respond to non-verified burglary alarms as an example and said that decision would be based on a <br />determination of whether there was a cost/benefit. He said the process would expose many of the types of <br />calls received would be subjected to that same level of analysis. He said a criticism of the Hobson Report <br />was its assumption of a level of service that had not been verified by the community. City Manager Kelly <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 22, 2005 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />