My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: PH/Ord.on Offenses
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 07/25/05 Mtg
>
Item 3: PH/Ord.on Offenses
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:45:06 PM
Creation date
7/21/2005 9:04:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/25/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Circuit Court, public defense costs are borne by the State and jail costs are borne by Lane County. Fine <br />revenue for misdemeanors is extremely low, averaging less than $100 per case, and cannot be <br />considered an offset to the additional costs that would be incurred by the City. <br /> <br />Misdemeanor case filings in Municipal Court have increased steadily for the past four years (Attachment <br />B). Additionally, police officer positions were added in the FY05 budget with no increase in court staff <br />to manage the cases these officers will generate. As described in the June 30 memorandum to the <br />Mayor and City Council, the Court and Prosecutor's Office have implemented numerous efficiencies in <br />order to keep pace with the workload and minimize the need for budget increases. A workload increase <br />of the magnitude represented by this option cannot be absorbed; additional staff and contract resources <br />would be required. <br /> <br />Additional time would be required to develop a full analysis of the financial impact of this decision. A <br />rough estimate of costs to implement Option 2 is provided to help illustrate the scope of this option: <br /> <br /> On-going Expenditures Estimate (FY06 Dollars) <br /> City Prosecutor Office $ 53,000 <br /> Judicial contracts 28,080 <br /> Public defense contract 39,493 <br /> Court staff 29,433 <br /> Jail space contract 58,854 <br /> TOTAL ON-GOING: $208,860 <br /> <br /> One-time Expenditures <br /> Court materials and supplies $ 5,000 <br /> <br /> TOTAL ON-GOING AND ONE-TIME: $213,860 <br /> <br />Option 3 - Modified INcrease in Prosecution Service (Minimal Financial Impact) <br />This option has the City adopting some but not all of the misdemeanor offenses from the DA's "No <br />File" List, which would allow the City to prosecute some of the more critical cases based on community <br />impact. By adopting into Chapter 4 of the Eugene Code the offenses of Unlawful Entry into a Motor <br />Vehicle, Possession of Burglary Tool, Telephonic Harassment, Theft 2, Theft 3, and Failing to Report as <br />a Sex Offender, staff estimates 400 to 450 additional misdemeanors could be prosecuted in Eugene <br />Municipal Court. This number represents more than half of the cases from the DA's "No File" List. IN <br />order to mitigate the impact of this additional workload, the City Prosecutor would more critically <br />review, on a case-by-case basis, the lesser offenses to reduce the misdemeanor charges to violations. <br />The number of cases reduced from misdemeanor to violation would significantly increase. An officer's <br />ability to arrest someone on the misdemeanor charge and to remove them from the scene of a crime <br />would be retained, but if the prosecutor reduces the charge, the person would be released from jail. No <br />additional public defense, jail space, judicial or court costs would be incurred. Staff work would be <br />added to the City Prosecutor's Office, but very little additional attorney costs would be incurred. <br /> <br />The types of offenses where cases are currently reduced from misdemeanor to violation are: Criminal <br />Trespass 2, Consumption of Alcohol on Unlicensed Premise/Open Container, and Violation of Park <br />Rules. Attachment B shows the number of these cases in Municipal Court and how often these cases are <br />currently reduced to violations. With Option 3, cases in these crime categories, as well as other low- <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2005 Council Agendas\M050725\S0507253.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.