My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: Meeting w/Planning Comm
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 07/27/05 WS
>
Item A: Meeting w/Planning Comm
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:03:52 PM
Creation date
7/21/2005 9:10:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/27/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Generally it is important to look ahead strategically and think long term about where we would like our <br />planning program to be and understand what types of opportunities and constraints could impact our <br />system. While this is not intended to be a comprehensive, complete list nor is it intended to be a <br />Strategic Plan, the following items have come to light for either the Planning Commission or the <br />Planning Division staff and are a good starting point for further discussion if additional time and other <br />resources become available. <br /> <br />· There are outside forces to legislate changes to our land use systems at a statewide level. The City <br /> of Eugene will need to continue to be strategic and be prepared to respond and develop policy for <br /> dealing with these types of influences that may impact the way we implement our plans. <br /> <br />· There have been some recent successes surrounding collaborative approaches to neighborhood <br /> planning and conflict resolution which can be built upon. Moving away from a 'one size fits all' <br /> approach has resulted in positive results and further discussion could help us build trust and <br /> consensus in our community for planning projects. This relationship is especially important with <br /> the city's individual neighborhoods, given the future challenges that lie ahead regarding infill and <br /> mixed use centers. If a consensus based approach to land use is desired, the relationship between <br /> the amount of regulation and ability to be flexible and to defer to the desires of all stakeholders <br /> may need to be considered. <br /> <br />· The Planning Commission has a desire to look at and review their bylaws and operating philosophy <br /> and see if updates are needed. <br /> <br />· There continue to be questions regarding the relationships between the proposed Region 2050 Plan, <br /> the Metro Plan and the City's refinement plans. A strategic, long term look at where we are going <br /> in relationship to these plans could be beneficial. <br /> <br />· Our partners in the Metro Plan, Springfield and Lane County, have been discussing publicly the <br /> pros and cons of reevaluating their participation in the Metro Plan. This could have serious <br /> consequences to our regional planning efforts. <br /> <br />· With additional emphasis being placed on sustainability, there will likely be opportunities to define <br /> specific roles in which the Planning Commission can assist. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.