My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 06/21/06 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2006
>
CC Minutes - 06/21/06 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:29:26 AM
Creation date
12/21/2006 8:18:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/21/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B. WORK SESSION: <br />River Road/Santa Clara Transition Project – Final Report <br /> <br />Assistant City Manager Jim Carlson welcomed David Reed of David Reed and Associates, Rob Handy, <br />chair of the River Road Community Organization (RRCO), and Jerry Finigan, chair of the Santa Clara <br />Community Organization (RRCO). He said Mr. Reed would present the final report and noted that it <br />purposely did not address annexation. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy welcomed the guests and thanked them for their hard work. <br /> <br />Mr. Reed highlighted the report for the record. He underscored that the Transition Plan was not code for <br />annexation. He pointed out that annexation was not the number one issue that people raised. He said the <br />chief concerns of area residents were infill, density, and development that retained the character of a <br />neighborhood. He reported that River Road/Santa Clara residents placed the highest priority on safe, <br />healthy, child- and family-friendly neighborhoods. He thought that alone presented the opportunity for a <br />continued dialogue between the City and River Road/Santa Clara residents. <br /> <br />Mr. Reed related that the framework of the report included a vision statement for River Road/Santa Clara <br />that reflected core values and beliefs held by residents, 10 goal statements recommended to implement the <br />vision, and 11 strategies and 38 actions that provided specific direction for implementing the framework. He <br />stressed that these elements were vetted at length by the task force. He noted that the City of Eugene <br />responded to initial drafts of the framework with a 20-page report and had only rejected two strategies. He <br />felt this had given early traction to the framework development process and represented a good faith <br />commitment on the part of the City staff. <br /> <br />Mr. Reed stated that he had a copy of the 1986 Urban Facilities Plan for the River Road/Santa Clara area, <br />the first chapter of which addressed the sanitary sewer element. He called the plan “woefully outdated” as a <br />policy document. He felt elements of the transition and heritage framework, the vision statement, the goals, <br />and the strategies would provide an opportunity to amend the plan and establish new policy directions for <br />guiding the direction of the future of River Road/Santa Clara. <br /> <br />Mr. Reed conveyed his deep appreciation for the members of the transition team and the task force and all <br />the citizens who had participated in the process. He also thanked staff from the River Road Park District, <br />the Santa Clara Fire Protection District, the Lane Rural Fire and Rescue Department, and the City of <br />Eugene. He extended a special thanks to councilors Papé and Ortiz for their help and the Mayor for her <br />“kind words of encouragement.” <br /> <br />Mr. Finigan related that he had helped to frame the 1986 plan and would not object to altering it. He called <br />the Transition Project a “milestone” in the relationship between the former independent communities of <br />River Road and Santa Clara and the City of Eugene. He said in the report one could see that the two <br />communities joined other neighborhoods in their concern about how the City was attempting to increase <br />density by infilling properties. He felt this was particularly true in Santa Clara where most growth was <br />occurring. He averred that current policy exacerbated the problems Santa Clara had been experiencing for <br />the last four decades, including stormwater issues and increases in traffic. He reported that in the outreach <br />sessions it had become clear that people chose to live in the area because they loved the rural feel and open <br />spaces, while being close to the services that “make life convenient.” There was growing alarm at the rapid <br />disappearance of open space. He suggested that the City could “go a long way” in establishing trust with <br />the communities by partnering with them in finding better strategies for community development. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council June 21, 2006 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.