Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kelly said the major challenge was timing as funding could be provided from the council’s contingency <br />if other sources were not available. He said it was necessary for the review to occur in the fall as the budget <br />was developed early in the year and suggested that one or two meetings of the full Budget Committee could <br />be added to the fall schedule. <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy noted that one of the challenges was to develop procedures for responding to funding requests <br />within a matrix that provided a comprehensive look at services and priorities and enabled the council to <br />make thoughtful decisions about those requests. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said she would support the amendment and while the council would make the decisions it would <br />be with the advice of staff and the Budget Committee. <br /> <br />The motion to amend passed, 4:3; Mr. Pryor, Mr. Poling and Ms. Solomon voting <br />in opposition. <br /> <br />The main motion as amended passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br /> <br />C. WORK SESSION: Railroad Quiet Zone Update <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor introduced Traffic Engineer Tom Larsen to discuss options that could lead to a quieter <br />downtown. <br /> <br />Mr. Larsen said a quiet zone as defined by the railroad was a cessation of the routine crossing horns; it <br />would not quiet warning horns, such as a train leaving the station or vehicle or pedestrian on the tracks. He <br />said the $2 million in additional railroad detection/pre-emption equipment estimated earlier was not required. <br />He said no State or federal funds were available for acquiring a quiet zone; some funding was available from <br />the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) for safety improvements but ODOT preferred the <br />closure of streets that crossed the railroad, which was contrary to connectivity requirements in the <br />development code. He said a recently established quiet zone in Klamath Falls had failed the review process <br />and was in the negotiation process. He noted there was some potential for ODOT through the Public Utility <br />Commission (PUC) to close crossings if they were considered to be redundant or unsafe based on the crash <br />history, independent of funding. He indicated that the City’s policy was to convert one-way streets to two- <br />way and ODOT would prefer one-way streets. <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy asked if ODOT would move to close streets even if the City chose not to. Mr. Larsen replied <br />that all crossings were regulated by the PUC, but it would take something dramatic at a particular crossing <br />for the PUC to take that action. He noted that Eugene was in the Cascadia Corridor and rail traffic, <br />particularly freight, was on the increase; ODOT, the PUC and railroads were concerned about what safety <br />improvements could be made. He said the most likely location would be the six crossings in six blocks at <br />Lincoln Street/Lawrence Street, Washington Street/Jefferson Street and Madison Street/Monroe Street. <br />City Manager Taylor added there was a conflict between the City’s view of those crossings and ODOT’s <br />view, but closing at-grade crossings had been a priority for railroad transportation departments for the last <br />30 years, especially as data was available to identify problematic crossings. <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy said she had heard from many constituents about the decibel level of trains and the impact on <br />people throughout the community. Mr. Larsen said that a new Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) rule <br />adopted last year capped train horn sound levels at 110 decibels and under that rule railroads had gone to a <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council June 26, 2006 Page 6 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />