Ordinance No. 20248 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

system development charge fbr the previous most intense verifiable use per system (i.e. parks~ stormwater, transportation, wastewater) shall be calculated and if k is less than the system development charge for the proposed use, the difference shall be the system development charge. If the change in use resuks in the system development charge for the proposed use being less than the system development charge for the previous most intense verifiable use per system, no system development charge shall be required for that system; however, no reimbursement or credit shall be given and an administrative charge shall be imposed. (4) A credit shall be given for the cost of a qualified public improvement associated with a development. The credit provided fbr by this subsection shall apply only to the improvement fee imposed ~br the type of improvement being constructed~ and shall not exceed the improvement fee even if the cost of the cap/tal improvement exceeds the applicable ~mprovement fee~ Credit may be granted only for the cost of that portion of such improvement that exceeds the government unit's minimum standard facility size or the capacity needed to serve the particular development project or property. (5) The methodology may provide for a credit against the public improvement fee~ the reimbursement fee, or both, for a capital improvement constructed as part of the development that reduces the development% demand upon existing capital improvemems or the need fbr future capital improvements or that would other,vise have to be constructed at city expense under the then- existing council policies. (6) Except to the extent that a capital improvement for which a credit ~s given is part of the phasing of a larger project and that the credit received against the systems development charge is greater than the charge for the phase where the capital improvement is constructed~ credit shall not be transferable from one development m another. (7) Credk shall not be transferable from one type of capital ~mprovement ro another. 7.735 SDC - ARpeal Procedures. (1) As used in this section "working day~ means a day when the general ofrices of the city are open to transact business with the public. (2) A person aggrieved by a decision required or permitted to be made by the city manager or the manager's designee under sections 7.700 to 7.730 or a person challenging the propriety of an expenditure of systems developrnent charge revenues may appeal the decision or the expenditure by filing w~th the city managers or, ce a written request for consideration by the hearings officer and by paying the fee for an appeal established under section 2.020 of this code. Such appeal shall describe with particularity the decision or the expenditure from which the person appeals and shall comply with subsection (4) of this section. (3) An appeal of an expenditure must be filed within two years of the date of alleged improper expenditure. Appeals of any other decision must be filed within 15 working days of the date of the decision. (4) The appeal shall state: (a) The name and address of the appellant; (b) The nature of the determination being appealed; (c) The reason the determination is incorrect; and Ordinance - 6