Laserfiche WebLink
remand is to render Ordinance 20224 ineffective. <br /> <br /> C. In response to LUBA' s remand, the City will be adopting a series of ordinances which <br /> <br />address issues raised by the LUBA remand. Together, the ordinances will result in the readoption <br />of the provisions of Ordinances No. 20224, 20235. and 20238 with deletions and changes necessary' <br />to comply with LUBA's ruling and the reinstatement of some provisions from the old <br />(acknowledged) land use code to fill in regulatory gaps caused by such deletions. <br /> <br /> The City held a public hearing on April 8, 2002 to receive comments on the <br />ordinances (Ordinance 1. Ordinance 2 [this Ordinance], and Ordinance 3). Notice of this public <br />hearing was mailed to the parties of the LUBA appeal. Testimony was accepted from anyone, but <br />'was limited to those issues on remand from LUBA. These three ordinances are to be the first three <br />in the series of ordinances described in Recital C. This Ordinance adopts standards that are clear and <br /> <br />objec:rive to replace some that were remanded by LUBA. <br /> Now, therel'ore, <br /> <br /> THE CITY OF EUGENE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br /> Section L Section 9.6730 of the Eugene Code, 1971, is amended by adding a new <br />Subsection (3)(d) thereto, to provide: <br /> <br />9.6730 Pedestrian Circulation On-Site~ <br /> <br /> (3) Design of On-Site Pedestrian Facilities. All on-site pedestrian paths provided <br /> for the purposes of compl'ying with this land use code shall conform with the <br /> fbllowing standards: <br /> <br /> (d) On-site pedestrian paths intersected by driving aisles shall be marked with <br /> striping or constructed with a contrasting paving material to indicate a <br /> pedestrian crossing area. <br /> <br />Ordinance - 2 <br /> <br /> <br />