Laserfiche WebLink
MovingAhead 2018 Outreach Summary 7 <br />Investment Option Preferences <br />In-Person Feedback <br />Participants at the open houses were able to rate each of the options for each corridor on a five-point <br />scale, from 5-works well to 1-serious concerns. Participants were able to provide this feedback through <br />a dot exercise as well as on the comment forms. The combined data, as shown in Figure 6, indicates that <br />participants generally preferred the EmX options compared to the other two options. River Road had <br />the largest disparity of answers with EmX rated relatively higher and the No-Build option rated relatively <br />lower compared to the other corridors. Conversely, Coburg Road had the least discrepancy between the <br />two Build Alternatives. <br /> <br />Figure 6 <br />Looking at the data in more detail (see Figure 7), we find that in most corridors, the EmX option received <br />the most ratings of “works well.” In the case of Coburg Road, the EmX option also garnered significant <br />ratings of “serious concerns” illustrating that for this corridor, this option may be more polarizing. <br />Enhanced Corridor options tended to have more “works well” and “works okay” ratings while the No- <br />Build options tended to have more ratings of “some concerns” and “serious concerns” except in the case <br />of the No-Build option for MLK, Jr. Corridor, which had the most ratings of “neutral.” <br /> <br />February 19, 2019, Work Session - Item 1