My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 2-19-19 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
City Council
>
2019
>
02-19-19
>
Agenda Packet 2-19-19 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2019 5:07:03 PM
Creation date
2/8/2019 4:56:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City_Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
City_Council_Meeting_Type
Work Session
City_Council_Meeting_Date
2/19/2019
City_Council_Effective_Date
2/19/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MovingAhead 2018 Outreach Summary 33 <br />• It would be nice if fares could be reduced/subsidized by say a fuel tax. Those that drive (like me) <br />would be willing to pay more to help get other drivers into buses. That reduces the traffic <br />congestion I have. <br />• You could help by having printouts of the boards. <br />• Nice open house presentation. Informed staff helpful to discussion. Thank you for thoughtful <br />process. This is visionary and exciting! Support evaluation of all corridors together, smart, cost <br />effective, educational. <br />• I don’t really see how this survey gathers helpful information. The point allocation part didn’t <br />make a lot of sense to me. I wasn’t 100% sure what I was allocating points to. <br />• I think concerns of people living in these areas should have the weight as the businesses in the <br />area and not less. Some decisions seem to only cater to business concerns and not the residence <br />of these corridors. This is not fair or right. <br />• It would be helpful to have more clarity regarding the difference between the Enhanced <br />Corridor and EmX options as they relate to each specific corridor. <br />• I think the City and LTD have done good things for transportation planning. This metro area is <br />ahead of the curve when you compare the level of transportation and variety of service of <br />Eugene and Springfield to eastern cities of similar size. I like all the build solution options <br />presented for each corridor. My only suggestion is related to the presentation. You should <br />consider showing a current road section above or below the proposed road section, so you can <br />compare the existing to proposed directly. Also, clearly labeling the right of way line on each <br />section would be very helpful. <br />• Is it a typo that the enhanced option for 30th ave would actually decrease ridership? I couldn't <br />find any explanation for that. Also, neither map for 30th Ave showed any of the yellow bike <br />improvements along 30th itself, which is probably the most dangerous section. <br />• Please contact Residents of Willamette Gardens Apartments themselves on Kinsrow Ave. We (a <br />low-income housing complex) AREN'T affiliated with the U of O and I don't appreciate the lack of <br />transparency, lack of outreach to us, and over-reliance on the university for communication with <br />Kinsrow Ave housing residents and I DON'T appreciate the assumption that 100% of Kinsrow <br />Residences are all 100 percent UO related. Plenty of non-students and non-staff live there. You <br />may contact me at 541-514-3535 <br />• the travel time measurement was stated something like ""PM peak travel time on a corridor <br />from farthest extent of the line to Eugene station"". This measure should be from Eugene <br />Station to the farthest extent of the line to capture the direction most people want to move at <br />the end of the day, i.e. from work to home. if you measure it as you stated you are capturing the <br />reverse of the commute most people need and it is not a valuable measure of system <br />effectiveness. <br />• Your Springfield and Gateway routes are done OK. Your west 11th route and execution are <br />criminal. Your arrogance is disgusting! Respond to what the VOTERS and TAX PAYERS want. <br />Going forward you could have a real nice rail system between the Airport and Amtrak station via <br />the existing rail right of ways, and include stops near each major arterial. That route would not <br />destroy existing traffic patterns and local businesses, provide a fairly rapid thru system, and <br />utilize existing rail crossings, and still provide local accesses. Your history causes major doubts <br />going forward. Hopefully you will plan and execute our transportation system better than this <br />non-responding web site. <br />February 19, 2019, Work Session - Item 1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.