My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 2-19-19 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
City Council
>
2019
>
02-19-19
>
Agenda Packet 2-19-19 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2019 5:07:03 PM
Creation date
2/8/2019 4:56:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City_Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
City_Council_Meeting_Type
Work Session
City_Council_Meeting_Date
2/19/2019
City_Council_Effective_Date
2/19/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MovingAhead 2018 Outreach Summary 53 <br />River Road. What would accurately portray the impacts is a traffic study/analysis of the current <br />traffic flow as well as the future traffic flow and then compare those results (driving times and <br />road capacity) to the expected traffic associated with the proposed transit center, for both AM <br />and PM scenarios. Additional buses and a light at Green Lane in my option will have significant <br />impact to traffic along River Road in the AM as well as the PM hours. Moving the transit center <br />north from its current location will not increase ridership on the buses so the number of <br />automobiles will not be reduced with the change in location. In fact, more buses north of <br />Beltline along River Road, the additional 56 housing units, and the two commercial buildings in <br />the complex will increase traffic along River Road. Driver times will increase due to increased <br />congestion and River Road will likely exceed capacity for longer periods of time. In my opinion it <br />is prudent that the traffic analysis be redone using the above recommended parameters. It is <br />the professional responsibility of LTD and your engineers to represent to the public the realistic <br />present and future impacts of your proposal. It is not sufficient to just state the expected <br />difference between a commercial development and a transit center. Thank for your time and <br />consideration. <br />• Will Northeast Eugene Miss Out on EMX? Moving Ahead is an LTD/City project that has been <br />looking at transit improvements along Eugene’s five major corridors. It's now evaluating <br />different possible investment packages. The lowest cost one leaves Coburg Road and Northeast <br />Eugene out entirely. The other four corridors get funded in all the packages (River Road, <br />Highway 99, MLK, 30th Avenue). It doesn’t make sense. We’ve had the fastest growth in the <br />City. Coburg has three major shopping areas. Chad Drive has become a business hub. We have a <br />raft of medical facilities. Why are we being left behind again? The Coburg route, if it does get <br />included, would run from downtown over the Ferry Street Bridge, head up Coburg to make a <br />right on Crescent, make a right on Shadow View and then left on Chad, and finally go over to <br />Gateway Mall. If you do want improved transit services here, speak up or we won’t get it. We’ll <br />have several opportunities: <br />o The nearest outreach event is very soon: Tuesday, June 26 in Willakenzie Park from ??? <br />to ??? <br />o Lots of other events all over town: listed below. <br />o An online Open House: starts in August. Get on the mailing list for it at <br />http://MovingAhead.org. Specifics are at http://MovingAhead.org (EMX vs “Enhanced <br />Corridors,” five alternative investment packages, detailed maps). We want <br />MovingAhead to hear that we need better transit out here. Don’t cut us out. <br />• We hear that our recent suggestion (to delay any final decision on MovingAhead until Transit <br />Tomorrow results in a preferred future transit network) is generating some internal staff <br />discussion. Remembering the politics around EmX West, we also believe that it will take more <br />than a few months to develop a broad community consensus around a preferred MovingAhead <br />investment package, in particular, to get a majority of the Eugene mayor & city council to agree <br />to the same package. We hope that a modest delay in finalizing MovingAhead will also provide <br />time for the Eugene City Council to engage more robustly and for a broad agreement to emerge. <br />If you have questions or concerns, please let us know and we are happy to say more in person. <br />For now, I will share that almost since we helped gain approval for EmX West back in 2012, BEST <br />has consistently advocated for a Jarrett Walker style "big look" at the transit network. With both <br />MovingAhead and the Main McVay Transit Study, we have stressed the need to not make <br />February 19, 2019, Work Session - Item 1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.