My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20257
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2002 No. 20242-20273
>
Ordinance No. 20257
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:43:40 PM
Creation date
7/21/2005 3:49:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
7/8/2002
Document_Number
20257
CMO_Effective_Date
7/8/2002
Author
James D. Torrey
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The next speaker was Ms. Blatchley~ who lives near the middle of Ayers Road. <br />Ms. Blatchley indicate that her one concen~ was that her son, who is a long haul trucker, <br />has great difficulty in parking his track on the Blatchley property when he returns home. <br />The ~esign of the ~raf~c mec[ians is such that one of th~n~ is Placed so that, in order to <br />back the truck onto the Blatchley property, the truck must back across the median. Ms~ <br />BlatChley complained that this desig~ had been contrary to an earlier promise made to her <br />concerning the ease of backing a tr~ck onto her proper~. Ms. Blatchiey requested that <br />the media~ at that location be ;ither removed, or that ~ median be m0~lifi~d to give it a <br />sloping margin that a truck could more easily back across it. <br /> <br /> Mr. Genovese acknowledged the concerns that Ms. Blatchley was expressing. He <br />promised that the City would W°r~k with her~ but he could not promise a resolution <br />favor~ab??. ~her concerns b~ecause of other ~ssues~ such as city stmndards. Ms. Blatchley <br />asserted1 ~taa~ her concerns at, out truck access to her property had been brought up at <br />several prior meetings~ and that she had received assurances that the design would <br />acco~odate the particular needs of her property. She felt that the City ~ad not followed <br />~2zrough on these assurances. <br /> <br /> The next speaker was Jim Edgar of 55 Ayers Road. Mr. Edgar began by asserting <br />that the whole, project was a fhilure. He felt that the design of the road was poor~ and that <br />the contractor ~ W;rk in construction was poor~ Mr. Ed~tr indicated that he felt ~he b~ke <br />path does not meet the code requirements because it ~s too narrow and has manhole <br />covers. Mr~ Edgar~ repeating Ms~ Jeffr~es' complaints~ wondered how the c~ty could <br />assess ~br substandard work such as he felt Ayers Road represented. <br /> <br /> Mr~ Edgar went on to complain that the bike path puts water onto the driving <br />surface of the road, because of poor drainage~ where the water collects, l~Lr. Edgar felt <br />that ~s problem was enhance~ by the fact ~hat the road was built below the ground level. <br />Mr~ Edgar also expressed concerns about the bike path. He felt that it wa~s not safe, in <br />that cars and trackS will driVe on the bike path to avoid some of the curves in the Road, <br />and that the tendency of the water to stand on the road will cause vehicles to splash biEe <br />riders. Mr. Edgar also expressed his dissatisfaction with the traffic calming devices in the <br />road because tl~ey will rec]uce the response time of safety vehicles. <br /> <br /> Mr. Edgar then read a letter from another resident of the area~ Jim Holm, <br /> Mr. Edgar expressed. Mr. Edgar then turned to a <br /> he had done among residents of the Ayers Road area. Mr. <br /> several survey responses. After Mr. Edgar had read one set <br /> <br /> ~ survey in its <br /> he wishedthem to be a part of the record. Mr. Edgar <br /> process~ as it was being <br /> Mr. Edgar noted that he had been the <br /> proposed assessment process since the Ayers Road project was first <br /> public con:anent. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.