Laserfiche WebLink
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to <br />direct the City Manager to prepare an ordinance that mirrors Springfield Municipal <br />Code Section 6.112, Unlawful Transfer on Vehicular Portion of the Right -of -Way, and <br />schedule a public hearing. PASSED 6:2, councilors Syrett and Zelenka opposed. <br />2. WORK SESSION: Housing Tools and Strategies -Construction Excise Tax <br />Planning and Development Director Denny Brand introduced the item and <br />Council Discussion <br />• Support expressed for the CET in general, but not the inclusion of the systems development <br />charge component; keep it simple and reconsider both the upper and lower limits imposed. <br />• The proposed CET will have a general negative effect on the General Fund; intent of tax is to <br />lower the cost of building affordable housing. <br />• Questions asked about how much money will be lost from SDC resources and the General Fund. <br />• The proposed process will be cumbersome for a couple of years and then simplify; the <br />proposed CET has strong, diverse support and can be adjusted after two years if needed. <br />• It is important to establish an affordable housing fund and the proposal provides a means to <br />this end; the legislation allows for some flexibility to use the funds for mortgage/rental <br />assistance and emergency repairs. <br />• The CET makes sense as a good start to the development of more subsidized housing. <br />• More information requested about the track record of the CET in other communities like <br />Bend, Oregon. <br />• The CET is a long-term strategy; the first two years will be challenging but can review its <br />effectiveness and make adjustments. <br />• Only the feasibility of the proposed CET was analyzed by the committee, not the economic <br />impacts; important to have conversation about what types of housing are most needed. <br />MOTION: Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to direct the City <br />Manager to prepare a draft ordinance for council consideration and schedule a <br />Public Hearing to create a Construction Excise Tax to support an Affordable Housing <br />Fund that includes the provisions described in Option 1. <br />MOTION TO AMEND: Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Syrett, moved to <br />amend the motion add a new Option 1.iii - "1.0 percent tax rate effective July 1, <br />2021," and renumber the rest of Option 1 accordingly. <br />• With this action, council will be creating a financing mechanism for subsidized housing that <br />will fall short on its intended purpose and necessitate a real estate transfer tax. <br />• Many Oregon communities have already established a one percent tax; confident it will move <br />the dial on the amount of affordable housing developed and the affordability of housing. <br />• The amount of funds generated through a MUPTE incentive is more than would be <br />generated with a CET. <br />VOTE ON MOTION TO AMEND: PASSED 5:3, councilors Clark, Taylor and Evans <br />opposed. <br />VOTE ON MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED: PASSED 6:2, councilors Clark and Taylor <br />opposed. <br />MINUTES - Eugene City Council January 14, 2019 Page 2 <br />Work Session <br />