Ordinance No. 20258 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

..... ~ lED PROJECT--~8~STEN~ W TH THE STATE~ru: ~ .................... crates no new parcels outside the UGB, and it should not incre~e the ~tential for encroachment beyond that ~s~ated w[~ the Approved Design. Social Consequences WEW?, ~he induced of affected lands inside the UGB, and this area as provided in the impacts are reduced by the fact that the designated lands near Terry Street) instead of being located closer in proximity to residential and °th~ developed areas. See Map 3 ~f the WEwp' I~weVer, in C°mpa~son to ~ no-bUild, the Modified Project does have significant visual impacts, as some may deem a roadway facility crossing open sp~;e to be unsightly. Still, others may consider it a visual benefit, rovidin o open space. Overall,_ the social' consequences-- ofalluwm~ ' the' WEP- P g pportunity to view. the resource, are not sianificantlv ri;fl .... ~ ,.--- . .g. i ~ , as opposed to fhlly protectm the ..... ; 7 ~ ~ -..r ~, ....... .. oome people w~ll find the Modified Pro' g ooJectmname t~ its ye ~ject socially y ry nature, where full preservation of the resource would no However others w ' t have this result , ouId find that th e tm roved m . . P obth rovt adveme vmual ~mnacts of the .~.-,..;~. ~-4 .~_ _ ~' p ~ .ded by the~VEP socially outwetghs ~ ~,~j,~v, ~,u m~ preservanon o~ the acres ot~ wetlands otherwise lost. Outside t~he UGB, social impacts aga~n would be minor Indeed, the level of that reSultin fro . . : pact ~s reduced over g m the Approved Destgn. As described m the Compatibility Memora~dura, access to four private properties on Goble Lane could be affected, but alternative access will be provided. The proximity o~:th~ facility to the railroad tracks and West t lth Avenue should Preclude ~y adverse ~:ommunky cohesion c~nsequences. Three residences will be impacted visually, but impacts are reduced for three other residences as a result of the alignment modification. Noise impacts could potentially increase for six properpz, owners, compared to eight for the Armroved Desigm ~oise iml~cts are not expe~ed to ~e significant ~/~ ~ However~ Because of WE~4r? and zoning limitations and the proximity of Fern Ridge Reservoir to the west, oP~li fm°_raicn~UwCeodulddervelo?rn_e.n~ is not high.~S Of course, with full protection of the resource, noLhee [' esult. St~ll, many rural residents surveyed v~ew the WEP as a social benefit. Environmenta Consequences The prim~ reason for shifting the roadway location from the Approved Design to the Modified Pr°J&t rein[es t° environment~i ~mpacts associated with wetland~ and threater;;d and endangered pla~t and animal resources. As the *Land [ke Technical Report explains, the extent to w endangered and/or threatened s,,ecies ......~-~ ~- ...... ~- -: ~ - i hich d~stin~kaishing the ~pl~;o,~ed I~}gn r~.ect, ea~ Is one o~the most ~mportant criterion much reate; ro~c~i; men l~roject, with the Modified Project resultin in . g . , p . n. S~milarly, the Modified Project wt~uld result ~ ~uu~mmaa""~' ..... -'-' tess; a5 g ~mpacts to desi note ' ' .. .. Y averse ~ g d bmlogmally sensitive areas and cmmal natural vegetation and habitat th Approved Design. It is noted that wetland rae,,,~ ............... ; i mn the fr- ' ~ . ¥~ . . ~ ..... , ....Jttena vtrtuatly me entire leu of the om just west o~ L~aneoo Avenue to near Goble Lane, outside the UGB.20 gth 'WEP ~8 Analysis of no~se impacts for s~ate land use purposes is no~ the same as for federal NEPA purposes. e~e~ devetepmen~ ~s addressed m mom de,mi m ~he d=scussion under OAR 660~O~ 2--0070(8), incorporated herein by ~his 20 see maps a~f~ched ~o f;he C~rnpab'b#ity Memorandum. EXHIBrT C-1 - FINDINGS 12