Ordinance No. 20258 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

lEO PROJECT--~ONS~$TENC, Y WITH THE STATE?~r~ ands are defined in Goal 10 as lands inside urban growth boundaries that are suitable, available and necessary for residential use. Hence, Goal I0 does not apply to affected unincorporated areas. The Modified Project does not directly impact any area identified for housing. Accord[ngly, Goal 10 is inapplicable to this land use proceeding. p Goa ( ubhc Facilities and Services) Goal 11 requires local governments to plan and develop a timel orde public facilities and seN' - y, fly and efficient a ~ces. The oal ro rrangementof g P wdes that urban and rural - - supported by types and levels of services ....... :_ ~ ~- ., ?eve?pment be guided and ,~tvla~upna[e ~r, trot limited to, the needs and requirements of the urban~ Urbanizable and rural areas to ~ s;rved, doal 11 is implemented by the Public Facilities Planing Rule, OAR 660, DivisiOn 11. Inside the urban growth boundary, the level of service provided b th appropriate to serVe urba . y e Modtfied Pro'ect wo n needs. Therefore, within th~ ~ ~,~ ..... - . -. ~J u be ~ u~Jr~, mrs alignment sattsfies Goal 1 I. Outside the UGB, the level of service provided by the Modified Project would exceed that appropriate for and needed to serVe the rural area. Accordin~l , a Goa JustificatiOn for an exce~tio~ +^ ~--~ ....... ~, Y: I 11 exceptmn is required. The TPR. ~, - ~u ~J~m ~ ~ ~s inCluded below in the analysis of compliance With the Goa 12 (Transportation) Goal 12 requires local governments to "provide and encourage a safe, conveni transportation system ' Goal 12 ;~ ;~-/ ....... ~ ~ ent and economic ~.. - ~,~ m~mcmeo through [he 'Frans o ' ' Dry,sion 12 p rtatmn Planning Rule, OAR 660, As noted above, the WEP is already a part of the acknowledged Metro Plan, TransPlan~ and Lane County Rural Comprehensive Pla~. Inside the UGB, merely modifying the location of the facility ~?°m t~e Approvec~ Design to the Modified Project Should ~ot im 1ica[; G would brin the ro' . . P oal 12 in an wa t g p ~Ject out of corn hah . Y y hat . . p ce w~th the goal. The Modified mode or functmn of the facd' . . . o ~ . P{oject does not alter the ~ty or increase ~ts ~,lanned capamty. The Modified Project does not result in a 10wedng of performance standards at affected intersections as compared to the Approved Design. Further, the ~vlo~ified Project is not a new use not already authorized ir~ the acknowledged transportation plans. ~m~o_d~!Qcat~on of the location of the V~q~P results in the conversion of u~ ~w nvnresource purposes Because use of the forest lands fo : ' affected a ricul r hlghwa u ses ' g rural and y p r~ was not prewousl a must he y pproved against the oals o taken ursuant to ' . . . g ~ g al exce tions P the exce tlon . P .. . p s provisions m the Trans rtatmn P ' - facthty, at those locations. By demonstratm', eom 1' . _ ~ po .. lanmng Rule to just~fyths · . . ~ pmnce w~th those roms ' 12 m achieved. Thejust~fication fo . .~ . P. runs, compliance w~th Goal below ...... r goal exceptmns in accordance w~th TPR mu' m me sec[mn analyzing eompl'~ance w~th' the~ ~'~'~ rye. q ~rements ~s set out Goal 13 (Energy Conservation) Goal 13 directs cities and counties to manage and control land and uses develo maximize the conservation of all r .... ,~ 7 . . ped on the land · u,n, menergy, oasea on sound economic principles so as to Highways are not generally synonymous with the notion of energy conservation. However, Goal 13 do~s not prohibit v~w higl~W~ys o~ ~mprovements to exist~g hi~h~,'ays. Indeed. such an ~n~erpretation WOuld c0hfiict with provisions in Goai 12 and the TPR au~;rlding h~ghway facilities and improvements as p~ of an overall multi-modal transportation pla~. EXHIBIT C-1 - FINDINGS 16