Laserfiche WebLink
~ST EU~NE P.~[KWAY MOGiF1ED PROOECT--Cg)NSISTENCY W~TH THE STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS AND TP~NSPORTAT1ON PLANNING RULE <br /> <br /> the approved project avoided impacts to Stewart Pond and the Bertelsen Slough Natural Resource <br /> Area, which it deemed the most significant natural resources in the area. <br /> <br /> Subsequent to adoption of the West Eugene Parkway exception, the County and City discovered that <br /> the wetlands resoume in the West Eugene ama was much larger than was previously recognized. <br /> Because, in addition to the WEP, tbe acknowledged Metro Plan identified this area for extensive <br /> industrial development, the City and County, together with LCOG and in coordination with state and <br /> federal agencies, embarked on a major undertaking to develop a wetlands conservation plan to <br /> identify areas for protection and areas for future development. Is This complex, extensive and very <br /> expensive effort culminated in 1992 with the adoption of the West Eugene Wetlands Plan, which is <br /> now an acknowledged element of the Metro Plan.is <br /> <br /> The approved [YEWP includes a corridor south of the Central Oregon and Pacific railroad tracks to <br /> accommodate the West Eugene Parkway project along the Approved Design. However, federal <br /> officials held off on approving that element of the WE~¥P pending further examination of alternatives <br /> that might reduce impacts to high value wetlands mad threatened and endangered species.l? Through <br /> further study, it has now been determined that the Modified Project would have substantially less <br /> adverse impacts on high value wetlands and T&E species than the Approved Design, thereby <br /> providing those Goa~ 5 resources with better protection. <br /> <br /> Modifying the WEP to shift the alignment from the Approved Design to the Modified Project will <br /> require an amendment to the WE~p. This could require a new analysis of economic, social, <br /> environmental and energy (ESEE) consequences under Goal 5 if the modification would result in <br /> different impacts from those previously considered. Because of the similar nature of the impacts for <br /> the Approved Design and the Modified Project, and because the Modified Project reduces the overall <br /> level of adverse impacts, it may be that no new ESEE analysis is required. However, in an abundance <br /> of caution, ESEE considerations are addressed herein. To the extent this analysis exceeds what is <br /> required to demonstrate Goal 5 compliance, it should be considered surplussage. <br /> <br /> Economic Consequences <br />As illustrated on the Comprehensive Plan Designations map at Figure 3-3 of the EDEIS, all areas <br />inside the UGB that are affected by the Modified Project are designated for industrial development, <br />except ~br a small portion of low density residential land west of Terry' Street. As shown on the <br />Existing Land Use map at Figure %1 of the SDE[& these lands are predominantly vacant or used as <br />open space. Because the WEP is already a part of the Metro Area's and C <br /> ounty s acknowledged <br />comprehensive plans, realignment of the WEP from just south of the railroad to just north of the <br />railroad will have no significant adverse economic impacts. The change in alignment west of Beldine <br />H~ghway would cause no additional industrial or commercial displacements~ As explained in the <br />~gDEgS purpose and need statement, the WEP improves access to the West Eugene industrial area and <br />would relieve congestion along West l lth Avenue~ thereby providing economic benefit. This <br />economic benefit is lost without the WEP. <br /> <br />Outside the UGB, most of the affected land is zoned for agricultural use. However~ for reasons <br />explMned in more detail in the Compatibility Memorandum, incorporated herein by reference, much <br />of the adjoining agricultural land is being used as open space for wetland mitigation or to protect <br /> <br />15 See A~temativea Memorandum at 3-5. <br />l0 In ~994, the Divisio~ of State Lands, US Army Corps of Engineers and the Environme~ta~ Protection Agency approved the <br />[~WP with conditions. Subsequently, over $7 million in federal spending has been invested in the WEWP to date, plus <br />considerable investn~nt from pdvate property ownem located in the area west of Beltiine Highway, north of West 11th Avenue, <br />and south of the Centra~ Oregor~ and PacCo railroad trac~s. Pdvate investment was made in good faith that the plan would <br />presage properties for development as shown in the plan. See Alternatives Mernorandurn at <br />17 A~temat~vea Mernorandurn at 4. <br /> <br />EXHIBIT C-1 - FINDINGS <br /> <br /> <br />