My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20258
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2002 No. 20242-20273
>
Ordinance No. 20258
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:43:58 PM
Creation date
7/21/2005 3:58:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
7/8/2002
Document_Number
20258
Author
James D. Torrey
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
262
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A~_TERNAT~V~S CON$~DE~D - ~P <br /> <br />In 1961, Eugene voters adopted a City Charter provision that required a vote of the electors before <br />freeway planning could be undertaken by the CID,. The 1961 Charter provision was repealed by the <br />Eugene voters in 1964. <br /> <br />Early plans extended I- 105 across the Willamette River to connect with the Roosevelt alignment <br />through West Eugene, but construction of the Valley River Center in the late 1960s blocked that <br />route. By the early 1970s, planning for the Roosevelt Freeway was completed and some right-of-way <br />was purchased by the state. <br /> <br />Community opposition to negative impacts on the Willamette River Greenway and the Whiteaker <br />and Roosevelt neighborhoods resulted in changes to the Roosevelt Freeway proposal in the late <br />1960s and early 1970s. In 1972, Eugene voters amended the City Charter to require a city-wide vote <br />on any future limited access arterial proposed within the city. <br /> <br />Meanwhile, due to changing community attitudes, the adoption of the T-2000 Plan in 1978 replaced <br />the Roosevelt Freeway with a new corridor in the alignment of 6th and 7th Avenues extending <br />westward. Subsequent development precludes this corridor from further consideration for a limited <br />access controlled transportation facility. <br /> <br />Several alternatives were considered over the next 8 years. In 1984, a Citizens Advisory Committee <br />(CAC) recommended two alternatives for study in the DEIS. 7~e DEl[S, released for public review in <br />October 1985, evaluated the two alternatives and a No-Build alternative. A Supplemental DEl[S was <br />issued in June 1986 and examined five alternatives between Seneca Road and Highway 99. A FEIS <br />was released in early 1990. The FEIS identified the Approved Design as the selected alternative. <br />Avoiding segmentation of industrial lands was one of the reasons for the selection of the preferred <br />alternative. The approved design in the FEIS included 4.5 acres of agricultural land outside the urban <br />growth boundary that required and received an exception to Goals 3 and 5 in 1986~ <br /> <br />Because the understanding of existing conditions had changed substantially since issuance of the <br />FEIS, the Modified Project was developed to address concerns related to these changed conditions, <br />and to provide art update of the WEP's potential impacts to these and other resources. After <br />discovery and inventory of a concentration of wetlands in western Eugene in 1987~ the City of <br />Eugene undertook a formal planning work program in January 1989 to develop the West Eugene <br />Wetland?lan (Ti{/EWP)~ Lane Council Of Governments (LCOG) managed the development of the <br />WEWP in a process separate and concurrent to the development of the WEP. <br /> <br />West Eugene Wetland Plan - The [{~EWP development process took place from 1989 to <br />1992. Lane County, LCOG, City of Eugene, Youth Conservation Corps, and Nature <br />Conservancy coordinate the development and implementation of the plan through a signed <br />coordination agreement. The approach for the development of the WEWP included a <br />comprehensive work program including technical analyses, agency coordination, and public <br />involvement to consider a range of alternatives. Of the eight alternatives evaluated, the <br />selected alternative consists of a balanced development and wetland protection prograrm <br /> <br />The purpose of the WEWP is multi-faceted and includes the following factors: <br /> <br />- Protection and restoration of wetland and waterway system <br />- Protection of natural diversity (referring to plants) <br />- Development opportunities and certainty (remove cloud for property owners) <br />- Define wetland protection measures <br />- Mifigafioo and banking <br />- Stormwater management <br /> <br />EXH~BFf C~2 - F~ND)NGS 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.