My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20258
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2002 No. 20242-20273
>
Ordinance No. 20258
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:43:58 PM
Creation date
7/21/2005 3:58:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
7/8/2002
Document_Number
20258
Author
James D. Torrey
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
262
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT <br /> <br />TECHNICAL ~E~ORANDU~ <br /> <br />Alternatives Considered- WEP <br /> <br />PREPARED FOR: Jim Cox/ODOT <br />PREPARED aY: Jay McRae, PE/CH2M HILL <br />COPIES: Mark Greenfield/GA <br /> Amy Hopper/CH2M HILL <br />DATE: October 4, 1999 <br /> <br />Purpose of <br /> <br />The development of the West Eugene Parkway Project from West 11th Avenue easterly to Garfield <br />along Highway 126 has spanned over three decades. Numerous alternatives have been considered <br />and many have been rejected for a variety of reasons - engineering infeasibility, inconsistency with <br />local plan, adverse impacts to natural resources, and unreasonable socio-economic impacts - to arrive <br />at a build alternative that best satisfies the purpose and need fbr the project. <br /> <br />The Modified Project (Northern Alternative) is the recommended WEP alternative. The alignment <br />includes a section that would extend part of the facility a short distance onto agricultural land west of <br />the Eugene-Springfield Metro area Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The Transportation Plannkag <br />Rule (TPR) governs transportation facilities and improvements located outside the UGB speci~ing <br />which facilities are appropriate in rural locations. Any £acilities which are not specified in the TPR <br />require goal exceptions to locate on rural lands. The exception statement required by the TPR must <br />address the identified transportation need and explain why that need cannot reasonably be <br />ac~mmodated through alternative modes, or by locations not requiring an exception. The TPR also <br />requires the identification and justification of the factors used to determine why alternatives not <br />requiring goal exceptions cannot reasonably accommodate the need. Under the TPR the <br />recommended WEP akemative would require exceptions to Goals 3, 4~ 11 and 14. <br /> <br />This memo is not an exception statement, the purpose is to provide a record of background <br />information and facts regarding the alternatives considered for the West Eugene Parkway (WEP)~ <br />Specifically, why those alternatives cannot accommodate the project need. The basis of this paper is <br />the Draft SEIS with additional research and information added as necessary. This document <br />considers the following topics: <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br /> Purpose and Need - description of basic premise of the project <br /> Project History - discussion includes general evolution of the project to date and planning <br /> context <br />* Decision Criteria- constraints, goals, and objectives <br /> <br />Proiect Context <br /> <br /> System Assumptions - fundamental assumptions related to the transportation system <br /> <br />EXHIBIT C-2 - FIND{NGS <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.