Laserfiche WebLink
ALTERNATIVES CONSt~D - W~P <br /> <br />In 1961, Eugene voters adopted a City Charter provision that required a vote of the electors before <br />freeway planning could be undertaken by the City. The 1961 Charter provision was repealed by the <br />Eugene voters in 1964. <br /> <br />Early plans extended I-105 across the Willamette River to connect with the Roosevelt alignment <br />through West Eugene, but construction of the Valley River Center in the late 1960s blocked that <br />route. By the early 1970s, planning for the Roosevelt Freeway was completed and some right-of-way <br />was purchased by the state. <br /> <br />Community opposition to negative impacts on the Willamette River Greenway and the Whiteaker <br />and Roosevelt neighborhc~ds resulted in changes to the Roosevelt Freeway proposal in the late <br />1960s and early 1970s. In 1972, Eugene voters amended the City Charter to require a city-wide vote <br />on any future limited access arterial proposed within the city. <br /> <br />Meanwhile, due to changing community attitudes, the adoption of the T-2000 Plan in 1978 replaced <br />the Roosevelt Freeway with a new corridor in the alignment of 6th and 7th Avenues extending <br />westward. Subsequent development precludes this corridor from further consideration for a limited <br />access controlled transportation facility. <br /> <br />Several alternatives were considered over the next 8 years. In 1984, a Citizens Advisor3, Committee <br />(CAC) recommended two alternatives for study in the DEIS. The DEIS, released for public review in <br />October 1985, evaluated the two alternatives and a No-Build alternative. A Supplemental DEIS was <br />issued in June 1986 and examined five alternatives between Seneca Road and Highway 99. A FEIS <br />was released in early 1990. The FEIS identified the Approved Design as the selected alternative. <br />Avoiding segmentation of industrial lands was one of the reasons for the selection of the preferred <br />alternative. The approved design in the FEIS included 4.5 acres of agricultural land outside the urban <br />growth boundary that required and received an exception to Goals 3 and 5 in i986. <br /> <br />Because the understanding of existing conditions had changed substantially since issuance of the <br />FEIS, the Modified Project was developed to address concerns related to these changed conditions, <br />and to provide an update of the WEP's potential impacts to these and other resources. After <br />discovery and inventory of a concentration of wetlands in western Eugene in 1987, the City of <br />Eugene undertook a ~brmat planning work program in January 1989 to develop the West Eugene <br />Wetland Plan (?VEWP). Lane Council Of Governments (LCOG) managed the development of the <br />[~EWP in a process separate and concurrent to the development of the WEP~ <br /> <br />West Eugene Wetland Plan -- The WEWP development process took place from 1989 to <br />1992~ Lane County, LCOG, City of Eugene, Youth Conservation Corps, and Nature <br />Conservancy coordinate the development and implementation of the plan through a signed <br />coordination agreement. The approach for the development of the WEWP included a <br />comprehensive work program including technical analyses, agency coordination, and public <br />involvement to consider a range of alternatives. Of the eight alternatives evaluated, the <br />selected alternative consists of a balanced development and wetland protection program. <br /> <br />The purpose of the WEWP is multi-faceted and includes the following factors: <br /> <br />- Protection and restoration of wetland and waterway system <br />- Protection of natural d~versity (referring to plants) <br />- Development opportunities and certainty (remove cloud for property owners) <br />- Define wetland protection measures <br />- Mkigation and banking <br />- Stormwater management <br /> <br />EXHIBIT C-2 - FIND~NGS 3 <br /> <br /> <br />