My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20258
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2002 No. 20242-20273
>
Ordinance No. 20258
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:43:58 PM
Creation date
7/21/2005 3:58:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
7/8/2002
Document_Number
20258
Author
James D. Torrey
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
262
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ALTERNATIVES CONSPIRED - WEP <br /> <br /> west of Terr3, Street, rather than along the south side as proposed {n the Approved Design. <br /> This would be accomplished with a grade-separated crossing over the tracks and the Amazon <br /> Channel near Terry Street, and would also require that the project be lengthened about 400 <br /> meters (1,300 feet) on the west end at its connection with Highway 126. In order to meet an <br /> acceptable ~evel of service at the WEP connection with Highway 99, a northbound to <br /> westbound separated grade was added. <br /> <br />When the results of the Public Hearing open comment period favored the Modified Project, a review <br />of non-exception alternatives was undertaken because a new goals exception would be required. All <br />but the 'Southern Alternative Corridor (Options I and 2)' failed to meet satisfactory transportation <br />operational requirements (see Appendix C for descriptions of alternatives). The Southern Alternative <br />was evaluated at a corridor level for prudence and feasibility. <br /> <br /> The Southern Alternatives were evaluated for feasibility at a corridor level. For the Southern <br /> Alternatives east of Danebo, the alignment is the same as the Modified Project. From <br /> Danebo Avenue to the west there are significant differences between the Modified and <br /> Southern Alternatives. In general, the alignment shifts to the south through the industrial <br /> lands reconnecting with West 11 th prior to the intersection of Green Hill Road. The <br /> alignment would bisect the Green Hill Technology Park and other parcels designated in the <br /> WEWP as developable lands. West 11th would be reroute& Westbound along West 1 lth <br /> would continue straight to the intersection of Crow Road and Green Hill Road rather than <br /> curving to the right. Upon review of site conditions, modifications to the alignment were <br /> made to reduce impacts to natural resources. <br /> <br /> Southern Alternative, attempts to avoid goal exception lands, minimize wetland impacts, <br /> and impacts to federally listed T&E species. However, the alignment is within close <br /> proximity to a patch of lupine, so would pose a greater risk to fender's blue butterfly (which <br /> will also soon be federally listed). The modified alignment was created as a refinement and <br /> to optimize costs and impacts. <br /> <br /> Southern Modified Alternative provides greater buffer distance from Kincade's Lupine, <br /> host plant to the Fender's blue butterfly (federally proposed endangered) than the Southern <br /> Alternative. Overall impacts and implementation costs were reduced from the Southern <br /> Alternative. The Southern Modified is further north and has more impacts to wetlands and <br /> T&E, including direct impacts to the Willamette Valley daisy (which will soon be federally <br /> listed) which make it unacceptable based on the federal Endangered Species Act. <br /> <br /> Both of the Southern Alternatives were determined to be unreasonable on the basis of <br /> combined impacts to the natural and social environments and cost as will be shown in greater <br /> detail in following sections of this document. The i~npacts to industrial properties of the <br /> Southern Alternative are similar to Alternative 2 and 2A considered and dismissed by the <br /> CAC during the mid-1980s in the development and selection of the Approved FEIS <br /> Alternative~ <br /> <br />Decision Criteria <br />During the development of a~ternatives for the October 3, t 985 DEIS, there was a Technical <br />Advisor3' Committee (TAC) and a Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) in place. The TAC and CAC <br />identified constraints, goals, and objectives. The goals and objectives have been used in the decision <br />process for evaluating and screening alternatives. At a February 14~ 1983 meeting, the project TAC <br />identified the following constraints: <br /> <br />EXHIBIT C~2 - FINDINGS 6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.