Laserfiche WebLink
was very complex and there was a limited budget to do the work; however, what the council requested would <br />be done. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly agreed that more information was needed and he would support the motion. He emphasized the <br />need to keep in mind the ultimate community goal of maintaining a level of community planning, environ- <br />mental protection and reasonable development. He said that developing a revenue stream to pay Ballot <br />Measure 37 claims would allow the City to be true to the law passed by Oregon voters and provide for <br />community planning that a vast majority of the public wanted. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 expressed concern with placing another burden on the City organization and Planning and <br />Development Department following the burden placed on them last week with respect to Goal 5 issues. He <br />asked if staff would need to be involved in the analysis. City Manager Taylor replied that it was necessary <br />for staff on the operating level to participate in developing the administrative details of the proposal. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ reiterated his concern with the burden on staff. He questioned whether it was advisable to be <br />working on the issue before the legislature took action and would not support the motion. <br /> <br /> The motion passed, 6:2; Ms. Solomon and Mr. Pap~ voting in opposition. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling adjourned the meeting at 7:08 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Dennis M. Taylor <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Lynn Taylor) <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 13, 2005 Page 9 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />